[Pkg-octave-devel] Lenny is out, time for work

[Thomas Weber]

Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 09:06 -0600 schrieb Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso:
> 2009/2/16 Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com>:
> > That means removal request for
> [snip]
> >        octaviz
> 
> I understand why the others have to go, and although I also understand
> octaviz is abandoned upstream, do we have to get rid of it? It's not
> exceptionally buggy, and I personally still have use for it. Has it
> been difficult to maintain?

It takes longer to compile than Octave itself. Apart from that, no, it
isn't too difficult to maintain. I wouldn't bet for it to compile
against 3.2, though. 

So, if you still have use for, I don't mind keeping it for now. But I
don't think it will make it into Squeeze.

	Thomas