[Pkg-ofed-devel] Why is debhelper (>= 7.0) required

Guy Coates gmpc at sanger.ac.uk
Tue Mar 31 21:44:53 UTC 2009


Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Guy Coates <gmpc at sanger.ac.uk> writes:
> 
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering why most of the ofed packages require debhelper (>=
>>> 7.0). I need backports for etch and that means backporting dpkg,
>>> debhelper, man-db and maybe more. Is 7.0 really needed or is that just
>>> there because stable has it?
>>
>> It is there because dh_make automatically put it there when I created the
>> packages. I think you can back the version down without any problems. You will
>> need to edit debian/compat too.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> AFAIK, the only other thing that you might need to change is the  ./configure
>> line in the rules file for the ofa-kernel-source package; some of the modules
>> may not build correctly against the 2.6.18 kernel.  (I have not tested with the
>> etch 2.6.24 kernel, but I suspect you will have better luck with that.)
>>
>> You will also need to grab the libibverbs, librdmacm1, libmthca1, libmlx4-1 and
>> libcxgb3-1 packages from lenny too.
> 
> We have the reverse problem. Out kernel is too new and the old libs
> don't work with that.
> 
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Guy
> 
> MfG
>         Goswin
Ahh ,OK. What kernel are you using; I think kernels >= 2.6.27 should
have the OFED 1.4 kernel bit in mainline, so you will not need the
ofa-kernel package at all.

Cheers,

Guy

-- 
Dr Guy Coates,  Informatics System Group
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1223 834244 ex 6925
Fax: +44 (0)1223 496802


-- 
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. 



More information about the Pkg-ofed-devel mailing list