[Pkg-openldap-devel] r620 - openldap/trunk-2.3/debian

[Matthijs Mohlmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Matthijs, 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:42:00PM +0000, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
>  
> 
>>Modified: openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/changelog
>>===================================================================
>>--- openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/changelog	2006-02-18 15:48:54 UTC (rev 619)
>>+++ openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/changelog	2006-02-18 17:41:59 UTC (rev 620)
>>@@ -11,12 +11,17 @@
>>   * Move to quilt patch system.
>>   * Fix manpage.
>>   * Make ldiftopasswd and fix_ldif executable. (fixes lintian warnings)
>>+  * Wipe passwords after we created the initial configuration.
>>+  * The config scripts is runned twice, this causes the password in
>>+    slapd/internal/adminpw to be empty. This fixes the issue with having an
>>+    empty password in the ldap database. (Closes: #343113, #347725)
>>+  * Added #DEBHELPER# token to fix a lintian warning.
>> 
>>   [ Steve Langasek ]
>>   * debian/slapd.templates: Fix typo durin -> during; re-run
>>     debconf-updatepo, fixing up the fuzzies (closes: #319596).
>> 
>>- -- Debian OpenLDAP Maintainers <pkg-openldap-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>  Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:46:10 +0100
>>+ -- Debian OpenLDAP Maintainers <pkg-openldap-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>  Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:04:25 +0100
> 
> 
> May I suggest to put the name of the uploader into the changelog entry
> when the upload is finally done? It does not matter what's in the svn
> repo for trunk but I would prefer the upload to carry the name of the
> uploader there.
> 
Sure, but when people are working on the package and there are bugs
coming in than it's better to have those bugs go to the list instead of
going to a single person and then the bug can be easily missed by other
persons working on it.

My 2c :)

>  
> 
>>Modified: openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/control
>>===================================================================
>>--- openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/control	2006-02-18 15:48:54 UTC (rev 619)
>>+++ openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/control	2006-02-18 17:41:59 UTC (rev 620)
>>@@ -48,18 +48,18 @@
>>  These are the run-time libraries for the OpenLDAP (Lightweight Directory
>>  Access Protocol) servers and clients.
>> 
>>-Package: libldap2.3-dev
>>-Section: libdevel
>>-Priority: extra
>>-Architecture: any
>>-Conflicts: libldap-dev, libopenldap-dev
>>-Replaces: libopenldap-dev
>>-Provides: libldap-dev
>>-Depends: libldap2.3 (= ${Source-Version})
>>-Description: OpenLDAP development libraries
>>- This package allows development of LDAP applications using the OpenLDAP
>>- libraries. It includes headers, libraries and links to allow static and
>>- dynamic linking.
>>+#Package: libldap2.3-dev
>>+#Section: libdevel
>>+#Priority: extra
>>+#Architecture: any
>>+#Conflicts: libldap-dev, libopenldap-dev
>>+#Replaces: libopenldap-dev
>>+#Provides: libldap-dev
>>+#Depends: libldap2.3 (= ${Source-Version})
>>+#Description: OpenLDAP development libraries
>>+# This package allows development of LDAP applications using the OpenLDAP
>>+# libraries. It includes headers, libraries and links to allow static and
>>+# dynamic linking.
>> 
>> #Package: libslapd2.3-dev
>> #Section: libdevel
> 
> 
> I may be mistaken but IIRC comments are not supported in debian/control.
> 
It seems to be ignored by dpkg, but it's not that difficult to remove. I
do it on my next svn commit. There are coming some changes to address
issues with upgrades to 2.3.

> 
>>Modified: openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/slapd.preinst
>>===================================================================
>>--- openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/slapd.preinst	2006-02-18 15:48:54 UTC (rev 619)
>>+++ openldap/trunk-2.3/debian/slapd.preinst	2006-02-18 17:41:59 UTC (rev 620)
>>@@ -16,4 +16,8 @@
>> 	dump_databases
>> fi
>> 
>>+#DEBHELPER#
>>+
>>+exit 0
>>+
>> # vim: set sw=8 foldmethod=marker: 
> 
> 
> Did you check the resulting script? AFAIR debhelper adds stuff that
> conflicts with the original script. Should have documented it, I know :(
> 
I didn't saw them, but I'm still testing the package.

> Greetings
> 
> 	Torsten
> 
Thanks for the reply!

Regards,

Matthijs Mohlmann
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD+ibC2n1ROIkXqbARAlfBAJ4xKJq4IT6tdFvXRGc/S+u/fVXmWQCeJ8BO
aSW4YJARiHlQ7mNBZKK04mw=
=Atl/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----