[Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] building package with different libs
Steve M. Robbins
steve at sumost.ca
Wed Nov 19 10:32:33 UTC 2008
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 08:05:28AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Manuel, you mentioned getting OpenMPI to work on all arches as your top
> priority; what's your expected timeframe? I know, "when it's ready" or
> "real soon now". But if this will happen in plenty of time for packages
> to transition before squeeze, then there's no point in doing
> mpi-defaults.
If I may, I'd like to suggest mpi-defaults go ahead despite
good intentions that OpenMPI be ready before squeeze.
That way, maintainers of MPI-using packages (e.g. me) don't have to
deal with the mess from today until the day OpenMPI becomes the
defacto default. If that day arrives before squeeze: no problem,
mpi-defaults can just disappear.
In the meanwhile, it serves a need. To answer Manuel Prinz's
question: *my* goal is only to build mpi-using packages with some
default MPI, not with all flavours of MPI.
Thanks,
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openmpi-maintainers/attachments/20081119/712b2656/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-openmpi-maintainers
mailing list