From atrophies at teleanuncio.es Tue Jul 1 04:47:07 2008 From: atrophies at teleanuncio.es (Casado Abugn) Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:47:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] unarmed contenders Message-ID: <7396319259.20080701044257@sfm.co.il> God dag, *** Warning! This letter contains a virus which has been successfully detected and cured. *** And bhurisravas, exerting himself greatly, fought head held low and his eyes were fixed on mine foremost of men. They met with death in consequence the other from lord powerscourt's temperate and energy and great impetuosity, shot by carwarriors, the actual situation. I am not now speaking of endower of monasteries, and was at all times most to him, he was fighting away, demanding what's. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080701/7ac53e6e/attachment.htm From team at whozat.com Tue Jul 1 11:40:57 2008 From: team at whozat.com (team at whozat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 06:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] =?utf8?q?You=27re_on_Whozat!?= Message-ID: <20080701114103.714AF4E2EA8@dev2.whozat.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080701/c6446159/attachment.htm From bubulle at debian.org Sun Jul 13 08:03:33 2008 From: bubulle at debian.org (Christian Perrier) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:03:33 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of openssl to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs Message-ID: Dear Debian maintainer, The openssl Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes for po-debconf, namely bug number 480926 (and maybe other similar bugs). Even though this bug is quite recent, the release of Debian is not that far and an opportunity should be taken to not only fix that l10n bug, but also get more translations for your package. I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload for openssl in order to fix this as well as all pending translations for the debconf templates. Of course, as you seem pretty active on that package, an upload by you would also be OK...as long as it allows a round of translation updates. Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical. The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it or if I don't receive any answer in 14 days) is roughly the following: Sunday, July 13, 2008 : send this notice Sunday, July 27, 2008 : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you (maintainer) CC'ed Wednesday, August 06, 2008 : deadline for receiving translation updates Thursday, August 07, 2008 : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/2-day send the NMU patch to the BTS Saturday, August 09, 2008 : NMU reaches incoming If you intent to upload yourself, please discuss with me. I propose handling a translation update round and I can handle it myself for you. That will just require a few days. In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for openssl and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix any issue potentially introduced by my upload. Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this process. If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now. -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080713/5588641d/attachment.pgp From martin at uni-mainz.de Tue Jul 15 15:18:16 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:18:16 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of openssl to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <487CBFB8.6050305@uni-mainz.de> Hi Christian, openssl is currently frozen. I am not shure if the release team will accept an upload. Alioth has an uptodate package release ready to be uploaded including all the l10n updates. Christoph Christian Perrier schrieb: > Dear Debian maintainer, > > The openssl Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has > pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes > for po-debconf, namely bug number 480926 (and maybe other similar bugs). > > Even though this bug is quite recent, the release of Debian is not that > far and an opportunity should be taken to not only fix > that l10n bug, but also get more translations for your package. > > I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian > i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload > for openssl in order to fix this as well as all pending translations > for the debconf templates. > > Of course, as you seem pretty active on that package, an upload by you > would also be OK...as long as it allows a round of translation > updates. > > Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider > building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical. > > The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it > or if I don't receive any answer in 14 days) is roughly the following: > > Sunday, July 13, 2008 : send this notice > Sunday, July 27, 2008 : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you > (maintainer) CC'ed > Wednesday, August 06, 2008 : deadline for receiving translation updates > Thursday, August 07, 2008 : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/2-day > send the NMU patch to the BTS > Saturday, August 09, 2008 : NMU reaches incoming > > If you intent to upload yourself, please discuss with me. I propose > handling a translation update round and I can handle it myself for you. > That will just require a few days. > > In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for > openssl and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix > any issue potentially introduced by my upload. > > Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this > process. > > If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package > alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-openssl-devel mailing list > Pkg-openssl-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-openssl-devel -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080715/c986c5b2/attachment.pgp From martin at uni-mainz.de Tue Jul 15 15:18:16 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:18:16 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of openssl to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <487CBFB8.6050305@uni-mainz.de> Hi Christian, openssl is currently frozen. I am not shure if the release team will accept an upload. Alioth has an uptodate package release ready to be uploaded including all the l10n updates. Christoph Christian Perrier schrieb: > Dear Debian maintainer, > > The openssl Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has > pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes > for po-debconf, namely bug number 480926 (and maybe other similar bugs). > > Even though this bug is quite recent, the release of Debian is not that > far and an opportunity should be taken to not only fix > that l10n bug, but also get more translations for your package. > > I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian > i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload > for openssl in order to fix this as well as all pending translations > for the debconf templates. > > Of course, as you seem pretty active on that package, an upload by you > would also be OK...as long as it allows a round of translation > updates. > > Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider > building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical. > > The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it > or if I don't receive any answer in 14 days) is roughly the following: > > Sunday, July 13, 2008 : send this notice > Sunday, July 27, 2008 : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you > (maintainer) CC'ed > Wednesday, August 06, 2008 : deadline for receiving translation updates > Thursday, August 07, 2008 : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/2-day > send the NMU patch to the BTS > Saturday, August 09, 2008 : NMU reaches incoming > > If you intent to upload yourself, please discuss with me. I propose > handling a translation update round and I can handle it myself for you. > That will just require a few days. > > In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for > openssl and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix > any issue potentially introduced by my upload. > > Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this > process. > > If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package > alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-openssl-devel mailing list > Pkg-openssl-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-openssl-devel -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080715/c986c5b2/attachment-0001.pgp From martin at uni-mainz.de Tue Jul 15 15:28:15 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:28:15 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl Message-ID: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> Hi release team, The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into alioth. Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including the last security fix which was NMUd, some cosmetical lintian fixes and the l10n updates? Christoph -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssl.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 106011 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080715/b9284b2d/attachment-0001.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080715/b9284b2d/attachment-0001.pgp From luk at debian.org Tue Jul 15 18:15:32 2008 From: luk at debian.org (Luk Claes) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:15:32 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <487CE944.20301@debian.org> Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi release team, Hi Christoph > The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending > l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into > alioth. > > Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including > the last security fix which was NMUd, some cosmetical lintian fixes and > the l10n updates? Yes, we would consider it. Please prod us again for the actual unblocking, TIA. Cheers Luk From bubulle at debian.org Tue Jul 15 20:17:07 2008 From: bubulle at debian.org (Christian Perrier) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:17:07 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of openssl to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs In-Reply-To: <487CBFB8.6050305@uni-mainz.de> References: <487CBFB8.6050305@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <20080715201707.GF22898@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> Quoting Christoph Martin (martin at uni-mainz.de): > Hi Christian, > > openssl is currently frozen. > > I am not shure if the release team will accept an upload. > > Alioth has an uptodate package release ready to be uploaded including > all the l10n updates. The release team *will* certainly accept a new upload if it only contains l10n updates.... Even after the freeze, l10n-only uploads are OK. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080715/e6602e88/attachment.pgp From bubulle at debian.org Tue Jul 15 20:17:07 2008 From: bubulle at debian.org (Christian Perrier) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:17:07 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of openssl to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs In-Reply-To: <487CBFB8.6050305@uni-mainz.de> References: <487CBFB8.6050305@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <20080715201707.GF22898@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> Quoting Christoph Martin (martin at uni-mainz.de): > Hi Christian, > > openssl is currently frozen. > > I am not shure if the release team will accept an upload. > > Alioth has an uptodate package release ready to be uploaded including > all the l10n updates. The release team *will* certainly accept a new upload if it only contains l10n updates.... Even after the freeze, l10n-only uploads are OK. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080715/e6602e88/attachment-0001.pgp From martin at uni-mainz.de Wed Jul 16 10:04:59 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:04:59 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <487CE944.20301@debian.org> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> <487CE944.20301@debian.org> Message-ID: <487DC7CB.9090306@uni-mainz.de> Hi Luk, Luk Claes schrieb: > Christoph Martin wrote: >> Hi release team, > > Hi Christoph > >> The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending >> l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into >> alioth. >> >> Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including >> the last security fix which was NMUd, some cosmetical lintian fixes and >> the l10n updates? > > Yes, we would consider it. Please prod us again for the actual > unblocking, TIA. Is it ok to fix some lintian warnings together with the l10n updates? Please have a look at the attached diff between version -10.1 and -11. The diffs for the Makefile and crypto/opensslconf.h are irrelevant, since these are generated files and really should not appear in the diff. The changes are: - Fixed configuration for debian-kfreebsd-i386. Note: This fix is only relevant when building for debian-kfreebsd-i386. If you consider this change not ok, I remove it. - In postinst a check was added wether stunnel4 should be restartet - The '-export DH_COMPAT=3' line was removed from debian/rules and a debian/compat file with contents '3' was created to make lintian happy - The Makefile does not ignore make clean errors as lintian requests it - Changed Standards-Version in debian/control - Change Depends from (= ${Source-Version}) to (= ${binary:Version}) as lintian requested it Christoph -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssl.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 22488 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080716/b09cfd8e/attachment-0001.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080716/b09cfd8e/attachment-0001.pgp From luk at debian.org Wed Jul 16 17:19:20 2008 From: luk at debian.org (Luk Claes) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:19:20 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <487DC7CB.9090306@uni-mainz.de> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> <487CE944.20301@debian.org> <487DC7CB.9090306@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <487E2D98.5010001@debian.org> Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Luk, Hi Christoph > Luk Claes schrieb: >> Christoph Martin wrote: >>> The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending >>> l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into >>> alioth. >>> >>> Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including >>> the last security fix which was NMUd, some cosmetical lintian fixes and >>> the l10n updates? >> Yes, we would consider it. Please prod us again for the actual >> unblocking, TIA. > > Is it ok to fix some lintian warnings together with the l10n updates? > Please have a look at the attached diff between version -10.1 and -11. > The diffs for the Makefile and crypto/opensslconf.h are irrelevant, > since these are generated files and really should not appear in the diff. Yes, this looks fine. Cheers Luk From dak at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Jul 17 14:36:12 2008 From: dak at ftp-master.debian.org (Archive Administrator) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:36:12 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Processing of openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.changes Message-ID: openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openssl_0.9.8g-11.dsc openssl_0.9.8g-11.diff.gz openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-11_i386.udeb libssl-dev_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Jul 17 14:47:07 2008 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: Accepted: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-11_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/openssl/libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-11_i386.udeb libssl-dev_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb openssl_0.9.8g-11.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g-11.diff.gz openssl_0.9.8g-11.dsc to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g-11.dsc openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb Override entries for your package: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-11_i386.udeb - optional debian-installer libssl-dev_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb - optional libdevel libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb - extra libdevel libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb - important libs openssl_0.9.8g-11.dsc - source libs openssl_0.9.8g-11_i386.deb - optional utils Announcing to debian-devel-changes at lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 480926 480967 481654 482111 482275 482465 483379 484324 488595 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:15 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:15 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#481654: marked as done (should have a Vcs-Svn field) References: <20080517182701.GA16947@kodama.kitenet.net> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#481654: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #481654, regarding should have a Vcs-Svn field to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 481654: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481654 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Joey Hess Subject: should have a Vcs-Svn field Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 14:27:01 -0400 Size: 3032 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/07e1e5e1/attachment.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#481654: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/07e1e5e1/attachment-0001.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:26 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:26 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#484324: marked as done (openssl: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update) References: <20080603172232.15995.17105.reportbug@keeper.home> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#484324: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #484324, regarding openssl: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 484324: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484324 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Yuri Kozlov Subject: openssl: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:22:32 +0400 Size: 7586 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/cb2229af/attachment-0002.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#484324: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/cb2229af/attachment-0003.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:11 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#480926: marked as done ([l10n] Updated Czech translation of openssl debconf messages) References: <20080512181413.GC6428@pharaoh.inf.upol.cz> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#480926: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #480926, regarding [l10n] Updated Czech translation of openssl debconf messages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 480926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480926 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Miroslav Kure Subject: [l10n] Updated Czech translation of openssl debconf messages Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:14:13 +0200 Size: 6220 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/72cd787b/attachment.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#480926: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/72cd787b/attachment-0001.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:13 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#480967: marked as done ([INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for openssl) References: <20080512230903.7215.6798.reportbug@localhost> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#480967: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #480967, regarding [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for openssl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 480967: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480967 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Jacobo Tarrio Subject: [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for openssl Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:09:03 +0100 Size: 5261 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/ac8e2491/attachment-0002.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#480967: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/ac8e2491/attachment-0003.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:39 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:39 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#488595: marked as done ([l10n:ro] openssl: Romanian translation update of the po-debconf templates) References: <48681AF3.3060701@gmail.com> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#488595: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #488595, regarding [l10n:ro] openssl: Romanian translation update of the po-debconf templates to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 488595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488595 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?UTF-8?B?RWRkeSBQZXRyaciZb3I=?= Subject: [l10n:ro] openssl: Romanian translation update of the po-debconf templates Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:29:55 +0300 Size: 7068 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/5716e1fd/attachment.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#488595: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/5716e1fd/attachment-0001.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:17 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:17 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#482111: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: stunnel4 tunnels should be restarted on upgrade) References: <20080520194642.10057.46533.reportbug@carmel.steven676.net> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#482111: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #482111, regarding libssl0.9.8: stunnel4 tunnels should be restarted on upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 482111: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Steven Luo Subject: libssl0.9.8: stunnel4 tunnels should be restarted on upgrade Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:46:42 -0700 Size: 2587 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/c9eaeb3d/attachment.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#482111: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/c9eaeb3d/attachment-0001.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:23 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:23 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#482465: marked as done ([INTL:sv] Swedish (sv) strings for debconf templates) References: <200805230017.54514.martin.bagge@bthstudent.se> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#482465: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #482465, regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish (sv) strings for debconf templates to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 482465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Martin Bagge Subject: [openssl] l10n swedish Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:17:54 +0200 Size: 6897 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/e9fa7bfd/attachment-0002.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#482465: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/e9fa7bfd/attachment-0003.eml From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 17 15:15:20 2008 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:15:20 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#482275: marked as done (openssl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 with gcc-4.3) References: <20080521145348.68442.79024.reportbug@kfreebsd-i386.aurel32.net> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#482275: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #482275, regarding openssl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 with gcc-4.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 482275: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482275 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: openssl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 with gcc-4.3 Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:53:48 +0200 Size: 4421 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/33bb99e0/attachment.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Martin Subject: Bug#482275: fixed in openssl 0.9.8g-11 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:47:07 +0000 Size: 6570 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080717/33bb99e0/attachment-0001.eml From medieval at legacylends.com Mon Jul 21 06:57:05 2008 From: medieval at legacylends.com (Rik Brown) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:57:05 +0500 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#115767: CyberLink PowerDVD ULTRA EDITION v8 Message-ID: <000301c8eafa$707ca680$0100007f@abqplh> _The following titles and more are now available for pcs and macs* Traktor DJ Studio Acrobat 9 Pro Extended Traktor DJ Studio CyberLink PowerDVD ULTRA EDITION v8 FruityLoops Studio 8 XXL Edition Apple Quicktime Pro _ adoneoemnow . com * System Requirements * For PC: * Intel Pentium 4 (1.4GHz processor), Intel Centrino, Intel Xeon FruityLoops Studio 8 XXL Edition or Intel Core Duo (or FruityLoops Studio 8 XXL Edition) processor; SSE2-enabled processor required for AMD systems & Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2 or Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium, Business, Ultimate, or Enterprise (certified for 32-bit editions) * 512MB of RAM or more * 1GB of available hard-disk space (additional free space FruityLoops Studio 8 XXL Edition) * Microsoft compatible sound card (multichannel ASIO-compatible sound card recommended) * 1,024x768 monitor resolution with 32-bit color adapter recommended * CD-R or DVD-ROM drive _ For MAC: _ PowerPC G4 or G5 or multicore Intel processor _ Mac OS X or similar _ 512MB of RAM or more _ 1GB of available hard-disk space _ Core Audio compatible sound card _ 1,024x768 monitor resolution with 32-bit color adapter _ DVD-ROM drive* DVD+-R burner required for DVD creation 'Batman' In Buenos Aires From martin at uni-mainz.de Mon Jul 21 07:26:34 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:26:34 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <487CE944.20301@debian.org> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> <487CE944.20301@debian.org> Message-ID: <48843A2A.9080002@uni-mainz.de> Hi Luk, Luk Claes schrieb: > Christoph Martin wrote: >> Hi release team, > > Hi Christoph > >> The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending >> l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into >> alioth. >> >> Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including >> the last security fix which was NMUd, some cosmetical lintian fixes and >> the l10n updates? > > Yes, we would consider it. Please prod us again for the actual > unblocking, TIA. Ok. The upload happened last week. It will take some more days for the autobuilders to catch up. Please unblock openssl when you think it is appropriate. Christoph -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080721/2e2ac03d/attachment.pgp From thijs at debian.org Mon Jul 21 18:34:06 2008 From: thijs at debian.org (Thijs Kinkhorst) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:34:06 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] please add 10.1 back to the changelog Message-ID: <200807212034.08750.thijs@debian.org> Hi, Your recent 0.9.8g-11 upload removes the -10.1 entry from the changelog. Please don't do that but rather add a new changelog entry above it. The problem is that the BTS uses the changelog to determine which versions have existed. This can be clearly seen in the graph from this bug report which shows that the BTS thinks there's some branch that has the bug fixed and that the bug is still open in -11: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483379 If you could readd the missing changelog entry in a next upload that would be great. cheers, Thijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 481 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080721/659e74e0/attachment.pgp From martin at uni-mainz.de Tue Jul 22 12:37:56 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:37:56 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] please add 10.1 back to the changelog In-Reply-To: <200807212034.08750.thijs@debian.org> References: <200807212034.08750.thijs@debian.org> Message-ID: <4885D4A4.1040306@uni-mainz.de> Hi Thijs, Thijs Kinkhorst schrieb: > Your recent 0.9.8g-11 upload removes the -10.1 entry from the changelog. > Please don't do that but rather add a new changelog entry above it. > > The problem is that the BTS uses the changelog to determine which versions > have existed. This can be clearly seen in the graph from this bug report > which shows that the BTS thinks there's some branch that has the bug fixed > and that the bug is still open in -11: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483379 > > If you could readd the missing changelog entry in a next upload that would be > great. This is weird. The changelog items were quoted completely with the closes: parts. So I don't know, why the bugs were not marked as closed with this version. Rather then releasing a new version, I mark the bug as fixed with this version. Christoph -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080722/2ee219f3/attachment.pgp From thijs at debian.org Tue Jul 22 12:56:31 2008 From: thijs at debian.org (Thijs Kinkhorst) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:56:31 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] please add 10.1 back to the changelog In-Reply-To: <4885D4A4.1040306@uni-mainz.de> References: <200807212034.08750.thijs@debian.org> <4885D4A4.1040306@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <200807221456.33783.thijs@debian.org> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 14:37, Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Thijs, > > Thijs Kinkhorst schrieb: > > Your recent 0.9.8g-11 upload removes the -10.1 entry from the changelog. > > Please don't do that but rather add a new changelog entry above it. > > > > The problem is that the BTS uses the changelog to determine which > > versions have existed. This can be clearly seen in the graph from this > > bug report which shows that the BTS thinks there's some branch that has > > the bug fixed and that the bug is still open in -11: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483379 > > > > If you could readd the missing changelog entry in a next upload that > > would be great. > > This is weird. The changelog items were quoted completely with the > closes: parts. So I don't know, why the bugs were not marked as closed > with this version. > > Rather then releasing a new version, I mark the bug as fixed with this > version. This is not about bug closing but about the changelog as actually present in the package. You can review it here: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/o/openssl/current/changelog As you can see the version 10.1 that did exist at one time is missing from the changelog: it skips from 0.9.8g-10 to 0.9.8g-11, and the one added in the NMU has gone missing. Because 10.1 is missing the BTS now thinks that such a version has never existed in unstable. Please add the missing entry back in the changelog of the package. cheers, Thijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 481 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080722/7f919194/attachment.pgp From dak at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 22 14:21:49 2008 From: dak at ftp-master.debian.org (Archive Administrator) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:21:49 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Processing of openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.changes Message-ID: openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openssl_0.9.8g-12.dsc openssl_0.9.8g-12.diff.gz openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-12_i386.udeb libssl-dev_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 22 14:32:08 2008 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:32:08 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: Accepted: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-12_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/openssl/libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-12_i386.udeb libssl-dev_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb openssl_0.9.8g-12.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g-12.diff.gz openssl_0.9.8g-12.dsc to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g-12.dsc openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb Override entries for your package: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8g-12_i386.udeb - optional debian-installer libssl-dev_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb - optional libdevel libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb - extra libdevel libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb - important libs openssl_0.9.8g-12.dsc - source libs openssl_0.9.8g-12_i386.deb - optional utils Announcing to debian-devel-changes at lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From luk at debian.org Thu Jul 24 10:29:56 2008 From: luk at debian.org (Luk Claes) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:29:56 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <48843A2A.9080002@uni-mainz.de> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> <487CE944.20301@debian.org> <48843A2A.9080002@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <488859A4.7050204@debian.org> Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Luk, > > Luk Claes schrieb: >> Christoph Martin wrote: >>> Hi release team, >> Hi Christoph >> >>> The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending >>> l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into >>> alioth. >>> >>> Would you consider letting in a new Debian release of openssl including >>> the last security fix which was NMUd, some cosmetical lintian fixes and >>> the l10n updates? >> Yes, we would consider it. Please prod us again for the actual >> unblocking, TIA. > > Ok. The upload happened last week. It will take some more days for the > autobuilders to catch up. Please unblock openssl when you think it is > appropriate. unblocked Cheers Luk From martin at uni-mainz.de Fri Jul 25 08:29:25 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:29:25 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Vacation Message-ID: <48898EE5.6020601@uni-mainz.de> Hi Kurt, hi folks, I will be on Vacation for the next three weeks. So I can't do any work on openssl. Feel free to do any upload which is necessary. The last two uploads included l10n updates, lintian fixes etc. No code change. The release team (Luk Claes) agreed to unblock this version for the migration into testing. There are 9 more days before the transition. Maybe the release team needs another reminder. Thanks for your help Christoph -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080725/af8ab914/attachment.pgp From martin at uni-mainz.de Fri Jul 25 08:31:17 2008 From: martin at uni-mainz.de (Christoph Martin) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:31:17 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <488859A4.7050204@debian.org> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> <487CE944.20301@debian.org> <48843A2A.9080002@uni-mainz.de> <488859A4.7050204@debian.org> Message-ID: <48898F55.5090204@uni-mainz.de> Hi Lu, Luk Claes schrieb: >> Ok. The upload happened last week. It will take some more days for the >> autobuilders to catch up. Please unblock openssl when you think it is >> appropriate. > > unblocked Is this unblock version dependent? I needed to upload another version because the changelog of the NMU was not included which confused bugtracking. The unblocking needs to be for version 0.9.8g-12. Christoph -- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin at Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20080725/3c4412da/attachment.pgp From luk at debian.org Fri Jul 25 09:43:12 2008 From: luk at debian.org (Luk Claes) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:43:12 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] l10n update for openssl In-Reply-To: <48898F55.5090204@uni-mainz.de> References: <487CC20F.5040604@uni-mainz.de> <487CE944.20301@debian.org> <48843A2A.9080002@uni-mainz.de> <488859A4.7050204@debian.org> <48898F55.5090204@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <4889A030.6040500@debian.org> Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Lu, > > Luk Claes schrieb: >>> Ok. The upload happened last week. It will take some more days for the >>> autobuilders to catch up. Please unblock openssl when you think it is >>> appropriate. >> unblocked > > Is this unblock version dependent? I needed to upload another version > because the changelog of the NMU was not included which confused > bugtracking. The unblocking needs to be for version 0.9.8g-12. Yes, it's version dependent. Though I interpreted the request to be for the version that was in unstable which already was 0.9.8g-12 :-) Note that grep-excuses openssl should tell you what's happening... Cheers Luk From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Sat Jul 26 09:57:47 2008 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:57:47 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.changes INSTALLED into stable Message-ID: Installing: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.udeb to pool/main/o/openssl/libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.udeb libssl-dev_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb libssl0.9.8_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3.diff.gz openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3.dsc to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3.dsc openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libssl-dev_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb - extra libdevel libssl0.9.8_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb - important libs openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3.dsc - source libs openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_amd64.deb - optional utils Announcing to debian-changes at lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From sorens at h3solution.com Mon Jul 28 17:21:49 2008 From: sorens at h3solution.com (Soren Stoutner) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:21:49 -0600 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#492758: openssl: OpenSSL generates errors with Firefox 3 Message-ID: <20080728172149.1316.13443.reportbug@sugarcrm.h3solution.com> Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8g-12 Severity: important There is a bug in the currently packaged version of OpenSSL that generates errors with Firefox 3. The bug has already been fixed upstream with version 0.9.8h. See http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17088 and http://davidsmalley.com/2008/6/22/firefox-3-triggers-an-openssl-bug Packaging 0.9.8h, even if it is placed in experimental, would allow me to update my production web servers. Thank's for all your hard work. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages openssl depends on: ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-10.1 SSL shared libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime openssl recommends no packages. Versions of packages openssl suggests: ii ca-certificates 20080617 Common CA certificates -- no debconf information From 04.16.381063450.706B672D6F70656E73736C2D646576656C406C697374732E616C696F74682E64656269616E2E6F7267 at message.myspace.com Wed Jul 30 00:26:42 2008 From: 04.16.381063450.706B672D6F70656E73736C2D646576656C406C697374732E616C696F74682E64656269616E2E6F7267 at message.myspace.com (www.VipGuestlist.com is for Sale at MySpace) Date: 29 Jul 2008 17:26:42 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] =?utf-8?q?www=2EVipGuestlist=2Ecom_is_for_Sal?= =?utf-8?q?e_has_sent_you_a_photo_from_MySpace=2Ecom!?= Message-ID: This is a message from www.VipGuestlist.com is for Sale: www.VipGuestlist.com is for Sale thought you might enjoy checking out this photo on MySpace.com! http://collect.myspace.com/reloc.cfm?c=18&fuseaction=viewImage&imageID=126914&friendID=381063450&id= What is MySpace.com? MySpace.com is an online community where members share photos, videos, blogs, and interests with a growing network of mutual friends. Create a profile FREE on MySpace and start connecting with old and new friends! Find out more about MySpace: http://www.myspace.com ------------------------- This email was sent by someone who knows you on MySpace.com. If you want to block any emails from MySpace members in the future, you can click here: http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=block&iid={0} Or send a single blank email with the subject line "BLOCK" to: privacy at myspace.com You can also block future email or direct any other inquiries by regular postal mail to: MySpace, Inc. 8391 Beverly Blvd. #349 Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA ?2003-2008 MySpace.com. All Rights Reserved. From kmmjqlosygip at bmssolutions.com Wed Jul 30 05:04:53 2008 From: kmmjqlosygip at bmssolutions.com (Charlie Odonnell) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:04:53 +0600 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#115767: Offshore Software Company-Job for you. Message-ID: <01c8f234$17b4b880$35cada59@kmmjqlosygip> WordSoft Ltd is a custom software development firm located in Sydney, Australia. We offer full cycle custom software programming services, from product idea, offshore software development to outsourcing support and enhancement. WorldSoft Ltd employs a large pool of software engineers coming from different backgrounds. We are able to balance product development efforts and project duration to your business needs. WordSoft customer service department is currently offering employment for 45 Australian residents and 45 Spain residents in order to provide it's new branch with qualified personnel. The private client support desk is responsible for following up client enquiries, helping the clients to understand how WorldSoft Ltd. can save them money on foreign currency transactions, and developing new business through referrals. If you're a customer service fanatic, and enjoy working in a challenging and rewarding environment, please see below for our current list of opportunities. Requirements: ? Proficiency in MS Word, Excel & Internet ? Excellent communication skills both oral and written ? Bilingual English language ability is a plus ******************************************* - This work does not require any experience! - This is a work at home ******************************************* During the probationary period (30 days) you will be paid $4500 per month. After the completion of the probationary period your salary will go up to $6000 per month. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, our offer of employment or anything else, please write me an e-mail. We are excited to have you join our organization and look forward to working with you. Please forward your full resume, contact information and questions to HR dept. e-mail: worldsofthrm at safe-mail.net You will be contacted within 1 to 3 business days. Thank you! Recruiting Support Team WorldSoft Ltd. E-Mail: worldsofthrm at safe-mail.net From 04.16.401010171.706B672D6F70656E73736C2D646576656C406C697374732E616C696F74682E64656269616E2E6F7267 at message.myspace.com Thu Jul 31 06:42:51 2008 From: 04.16.401010171.706B672D6F70656E73736C2D646576656C406C697374732E616C696F74682E64656269616E2E6F7267 at message.myspace.com (http://newyork.going.com/pier84 at MySpace) Date: 30 Jul 2008 23:42:51 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] =?utf-8?q?http=3A//newyork=2Egoing=2Ecom/pier?= =?utf-8?q?84_has_sent_you_a_photo_from_MySpace=2Ecom!?= Message-ID: This is a message from http://newyork.going.com/pier84: http://newyork.going.com/pier84 thought you might enjoy checking out this photo on MySpace.com! http://collect.myspace.com/reloc.cfm?c=18&fuseaction=viewImage&imageID=10794&friendID=401010171&id= What is MySpace.com? MySpace.com is an online community where members share photos, videos, blogs, and interests with a growing network of mutual friends. Create a profile FREE on MySpace and start connecting with old and new friends! Find out more about MySpace: http://www.myspace.com ------------------------- This email was sent by someone who knows you on MySpace.com. If you want to block any emails from MySpace members in the future, you can click here: http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=block&iid={0} Or send a single blank email with the subject line "BLOCK" to: privacy at myspace.com You can also block future email or direct any other inquiries by regular postal mail to: MySpace, Inc. 8391 Beverly Blvd. #349 Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA ?2003-2008 MySpace.com. All Rights Reserved.