From kurt at roeckx.be Tue Sep 1 22:05:45 2015 From: kurt at roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:05:45 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#797362: Bug#797362: libssl-dev: man page for ASN1 section 3 missing In-Reply-To: <55E4C3A7.7060304@online.de> References: <20150829233029.22519.30060.reportbug@boston.fritz.box> <20150830095055.GA21481@roeckx.be> <55E4B3DC.2040105@online.de> <20150831202652.GA28270@roeckx.be> <55E4C3A7.7060304@online.de> Message-ID: <20150901220545.GA1533@roeckx.be> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:14:15PM +0200, Alexander Koeppe wrote: > Am 31.08.2015 um 22:26 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > I'm unsure why you think you need to know anything about the ASN1 > > functions. I suggest that if you can you stay away from ASN1. Kurt > Simply because I'm contributing to an open source project which > leverages the use of the openssl library. I've got to a point where I > couldn't continue using the Standard API. If you want to handle > different values in a certificate such helper functions become necessary. I haven't tried to go this deep in a certificate using OpenSSL yet, so I can't really help you at this point. It also seems unlikely that we get that documented properly soon, ASN1 would clearly be lower priority to get documented than various other things that are not properly documented. If you need help with something I suggest you mail to the openssl-users at openssl.org list. You're also of course free to contribute the documentation. Kurt From format_c at online.de Fri Sep 4 22:56:21 2015 From: format_c at online.de (Alexander Koeppe) Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:56:21 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#797362: Bug#797362: libssl-dev: man page for ASN1 section 3 missing In-Reply-To: <20150901220545.GA1533@roeckx.be> References: <20150829233029.22519.30060.reportbug@boston.fritz.box> <20150830095055.GA21481@roeckx.be> <55E4B3DC.2040105@online.de> <20150831202652.GA28270@roeckx.be> <55E4C3A7.7060304@online.de> <20150901220545.GA1533@roeckx.be> Message-ID: <55EA2195.4070903@online.de> Am 02.09.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > I haven't tried to go this deep in a certificate using OpenSSL yet, so > I can't really help you at this point. It also seems unlikely that we > get that documented properly soon, ASN1 would clearly be lower > priority to get documented than various other things that are not > properly documented. If you need help with something I suggest you > mail to the openssl-users at openssl.org list. You're also of course free > to contribute the documentation. Kurt OK thanks. I'll follow the proposed approach asking the Mailinglist for upcoming questions that I'm not able to solve using my FBI skills. I just thought that I'm couldn't be the first human that tripped into this trap. My inquiry may be too exotic hence if you haven't experienced such issues already, lets close it this way. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Sep 6 17:05:03 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 17:05:03 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Processing of openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openssl_1.0.2d-2.dsc openssl_1.0.2d-2.debian.tar.xz libcrypto1.0.2-udeb_1.0.2d-2_amd64.udeb libssl-dev_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb libssl-doc_1.0.2d-2_all.deb libssl1.0.2-dbg_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb libssl1.0.2_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Sep 6 17:24:11 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 17:24:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:libcrypto1.0.2-udeb is NEW. binary:libssl1.0.2 is NEW. binary:libssl1.0.2-dbg is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Sep 7 12:03:05 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:03:05 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Processed: Re: openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! References: <1441627220.15927.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20150715105224.10360.74810.reportbug@neutron.trustmatta.com> Message-ID: Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #792490 [openssl] openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tag -1 - security Bug #792490 [openssl] openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! Removed tag(s) security. -- 792490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From ben at decadent.org.uk Mon Sep 7 12:00:20 2015 From: ben at decadent.org.uk (Ben Hutchings) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 13:00:20 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#792490: openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! In-Reply-To: <20150715105224.10360.74810.reportbug@neutron.trustmatta.com> References: <20150715105224.10360.74810.reportbug@neutron.trustmatta.com> Message-ID: <1441627220.15927.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 - security On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:52:24 +0200 Florent Daigniere < nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > Package: openssl > Version: 1.0.2d-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Dear Maintainer, > > It looks like openssl s_client is not providing any way to disregard the system's trusted CAs anymore... and this is a regression from Jessie. [...] openssl s_client doesn't check the certificate's names either, and never has. It should only be used for debugging, not to make a secure tunnel. For secure tunnelling see the example in Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your own home. - Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, `Good Omens' -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Sep 7 12:03:11 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:03:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Processed: Re: openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! References: <1441627220.15927.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20150715105224.10360.74810.reportbug@neutron.trustmatta.com> Message-ID: Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #792490 [openssl] openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 792490 to the same value. > tag -1 - security Bug #792490 [openssl] openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #792490 to the same tags previously set -- 792490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From nextgens at freenetproject.org Mon Sep 7 12:56:44 2015 From: nextgens at freenetproject.org (Florent Daigniere) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 14:56:44 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#792490: openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! In-Reply-To: <1441627220.15927.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> References: <20150715105224.10360.74810.reportbug@neutron.trustmatta.com> <1441627220.15927.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> Message-ID: <1441630604.2832.8.camel@freenetproject.org> On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 13:00 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > openssl s_client doesn't check the certificate's names either, and > never has. It should only be used for debugging, not to make a > secure > tunnel. For secure tunnelling see the example in > -debian.html> > > Ben. > Agreed. The catch is that it's useless as a debugging tool too with the new behaviour (see bug #792396). There's no indication whatsoever that the system's CA path has been added to the certificate chain... and the manual goes as far as suggesting that it isn't: " -CApath directory The directory to use for server certificate verification. [...] " Florent From kurt at roeckx.be Mon Sep 7 13:24:33 2015 From: kurt at roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 15:24:33 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#792490: Bug#792490: openssl s_client doesn't allow for certificate pinning anymore! In-Reply-To: <1441630604.2832.8.camel@freenetproject.org> References: <20150715105224.10360.74810.reportbug@neutron.trustmatta.com> <1441627220.15927.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> <1441630604.2832.8.camel@freenetproject.org> Message-ID: <20150907132433.GA29381@roeckx.be> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:56:44PM +0200, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > Agreed. The catch is that it's useless as a debugging tool too with the > new behaviour (see bug #792396). There's no indication whatsoever that > the system's CA path has been added to the certificate chain... and the > manual goes as far as suggesting that it isn't: > > " > -CApath directory > The directory to use for server certificate verification. [...] > " As far as I know there is a default CApath being used, and using -CApath adds that directory. But I think it might be unexpected, and clearly is still under documented. I think there was some change in behaviour between 1.0.1 and 1.0.2, but I can't remember the details. Kurt From morph at debian.org Mon Sep 7 16:35:55 2015 From: morph at debian.org (Sandro Tosi) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:35:55 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] how to prevent libssl1.0.0:amd64 from asking to restart processes on upgrade Message-ID: Hey! I'm preparing the migration from wheezy to jessie, and so I'm trying to script/automate everything, including the debconf questions, but I have a bit of a problem with libssl1.0.0:amd64 which keeps asking me if it's ok to restart services even if I ran echo libssl1.0.0 libssl1.0.0/restart-services string true | debconf-set-selections echo libssl1.0.0:amd64 libssl1.0.0/restart-services string true | debconf-set-selections before starting the installation (I got those values from debconf-get-selections on a jessie machine). Do you know how should I fix it? Thanks a ton in advance, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi From jesus.walsh at mtavr.ru Tue Sep 8 12:09:53 2015 From: jesus.walsh at mtavr.ru (E-ZPass Support) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:09:53 +0400 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Indebtedness for driving on toll road #0000504451 Message-ID: <73dd53247445d02b8e8f3a36df65605e@mtavr.ru> Notice to Appear, You have not paid for driving on a toll road. You are kindly asked to pay your debt as soon as possible. The invoice is attached to this email. Regards, Jesus Walsh, E-ZPass Manager. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Invoice_0000504451.zip Type: application/zip Size: 3699 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:00:15 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:15 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 14:21:27 +0200 Source: openssl Binary: openssl libssl1.0.2 libcrypto1.0.2-udeb libssl-dev libssl-doc libssl1.0.2-dbg Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.0.2d-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OpenSSL Team Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx Description: libcrypto1.0.2-udeb - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - libcrypto udeb (udeb) libssl-dev - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - development files libssl-doc - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - development documentation libssl1.0.2 - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries libssl1.0.2-dbg - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - debug information openssl - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - cryptographic utility Closes: 630790 768476 782492 Changes: openssl (1.0.2d-2) experimental; urgency=medium . * Build with no-ssl3-method to remove all SSLv3 support. This results in the functions SSLv3_method(), SSLv3_server_method() and SSLv3_client_method() being removed from libssl. Change the soname as result of that and also changes name of the binary package. (Closes: #768476) * Enable rfc3779 and cms support (Closes: #630790) * Fix cross compilation for mips architectures. (Closes: #782492) Checksums-Sha1: 757b61b665366bc4367fcfc7db109096a2035fb8 2227 openssl_1.0.2d-2.dsc e1c66443cccdfbff6263b369688c913e38a4b78c 75724 openssl_1.0.2d-2.debian.tar.xz 6d1cee9e5172e538ab34a9bb9ad640ac19b5e195 872266 libcrypto1.0.2-udeb_1.0.2d-2_amd64.udeb 3d33010245f27ef3a1138bd4bdc5bec0a78778cc 1535748 libssl-dev_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb 4a13eb684dd000d0e25cb00c878991e2594ac921 1244526 libssl-doc_1.0.2d-2_all.deb 2dd085e144e67421cdf811e4b539b35a395d8560 2975812 libssl1.0.2-dbg_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb 745bd9d344be8e298f416f8c8a4be75a857e3589 1277674 libssl1.0.2_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb 557bd544b99aefb95deb5076031d5e3affbc4d5c 694290 openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: f5a0f8fc0a0663863a3983c4dc8659124abb0b67b55380d9226216dd8883a8a6 2227 openssl_1.0.2d-2.dsc 4a1cffd7d0d343f1f6371e2e2889611265cbfa2ba3ab6b6d616b6f0d28f35534 75724 openssl_1.0.2d-2.debian.tar.xz 5b7fb22d90ee592509f52413a7d12355b4d70804ac2fc9b04ea9ee3b0b36465b 872266 libcrypto1.0.2-udeb_1.0.2d-2_amd64.udeb 0872b88bfe40c8cb7e8b5416566bb03fee1f6af1fa38e30fea071424afbdfffe 1535748 libssl-dev_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb 4f28934cc10359dfaf7c04728c0e1f6e217fc005aa3e4491f3c30708ce23e4da 1244526 libssl-doc_1.0.2d-2_all.deb 45190b23788b21a4fcd630d305c756e42b8dbf539b56df265d6b4723dd92930e 2975812 libssl1.0.2-dbg_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb d51e8b58b9399bceb56615b6a42b82a866f93ea9303dc27cfb9f7187fbf9259a 1277674 libssl1.0.2_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb e2e1f84b6538a552a67c668e6d4b18afed665083ff5c5934ce1200132a8d1c77 694290 openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb Files: 6758c7b41d1e514cd7c21c1f436e97b3 2227 utils optional openssl_1.0.2d-2.dsc 42d374bb45602824b51c89292a390455 75724 utils optional openssl_1.0.2d-2.debian.tar.xz 6db42703c5796a42016691d0c6dee7c1 872266 debian-installer optional libcrypto1.0.2-udeb_1.0.2d-2_amd64.udeb 8723319c14e450aeaa93d186195f26a8 1535748 libdevel optional libssl-dev_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb 57d5d1b5dfb6b45e4c9a06b71eb52a99 1244526 doc optional libssl-doc_1.0.2d-2_all.deb 3a3f681f0a3c79974a84edcd70138017 2975812 debug extra libssl1.0.2-dbg_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb b0da6c6a4ad9ba3ef67432052f92f616 1277674 libs important libssl1.0.2_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb 1e943da9c4f1535f5485bcc89e587db3 694290 utils optional openssl_1.0.2d-2_amd64.deb Package-Type: udeb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV7HFQAAoJEOPE3c0eTBJE/AQP/iJG4ho0seJ2bV9RUx4k9wh5 c/WXg1XjCjxp61wvB3eVSmNqCfVbqdE1RGq/Fb6m2+S9Jdy7tW37yfI6uQiU9W/O 681uOtUMM6BHm5EMP9KyYzqPPOuoiqRBhOIEeKN8Af7ganDf/OIviJdlK8Ha1UMW tj9Nx6qTKNSTMRsef05P5a1r4ODEvhE3RpyxE9WkpUjrJ42kbeab1KFGmxVVQUPJ Ntqe4Mq3Al/GwqsUuMcsueMbXrdprft2MW0rWyU2LnSfBQDSjfpPmUp6CoP6XBDh gd7BbffbMyUhrAikTMIK58G7k3SywVLLzzwpNm1lMXx925CeaJ9cyHjoWcsw1/gS a0/folNOQ7WHZH8jc4cpwKLUR6vDHN5Ql6YRDFJ1NXA53hXVg/Jj21yBMYXBaziB T/CiVPNJ+inz1Oic56g3SzZufCWUjawYBbAuC0Hii7iEsxTCro4NoyebdUVhI1qq KKichORY1mqvvjsip0q2HBmrojk/FCBlrVdOLfgsCKSfP8HJ/Wypd4nY8s1qmEbv Ot3fM6adkpTiEgMTwoOOKjiJLF6EdP3VNCH5Kz+j+ZGNHCSxjpBVmUaaMjzCWqSs tmx5keEUH4mM6VqS/W55VZpEviaNPFIBnxC600exABVkoQnD8XnQ8GwT/E8gWqZD sjtjLa/74En7I47nn2RZ =PzMk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:04 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:04 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#630790: marked as done (openssl: compile with rfc3779 and cms support) References: <20110617114740.13436.13402.reportbug@tw1.amsterdam1.surf.net> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#630790: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #630790, regarding openssl: compile with rfc3779 and cms support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 630790: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630790 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Francois Kooman Subject: openssl: compile with rfc3779 and cms support Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:47:40 +0200 Size: 2716 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#630790: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7290 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:09 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:09 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#769023: marked as done (openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump) References: <20141110191447.32570.2870.reportbug@box> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Dirk Schmidt Subject: libssl1.0.0 from experimental renders the following packages unusable: reportbug, namebench. Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:14:47 +0100 Size: 2468 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:08 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:08 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#768522: marked as done (openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump) References: <545D7C01.8090909@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Jos van Wolput Subject: libcurl3 (version 7.38.0-3) relocation error Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:12:17 +0800 Size: 3103 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:07 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#768476: marked as done (openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump) References: <20141107163820.19600.12653.reportbug@localhost> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Michael Moravec Subject: openssl 1.0.2~beta3-1: relocation error in libraries depending on libssl.so Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:38:20 +0100 Size: 2631 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:10 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:10 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#770278: marked as done (openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump) References: <20141120065313.13068.7768.reportbug@king-coder13> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Michael Ott Subject: curl: Problems with SSL symbol Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:53:13 +0100 Size: 2380 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:11 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#770605: marked as done (openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump) References: <5470A792.60705@debian.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Pirate Praveen Subject: bundle install fails with missing openssl error Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 20:41:14 +0530 Size: 4093 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:12 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:12 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#771169: marked as done (openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump) References: <20141127103430.12603.16462.reportbug@localhost> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding openssl: Removes symbol without SONAME bump to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Salvo Tomaselli Subject: curl: relocation error, missing symbol Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:34:30 +0100 Size: 3523 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:14 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:14 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#781094: marked as done (curl: relocation error on starting) References: <20150324125749.514.89231.reportbug@steambox.siccegge.de> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding curl: relocation error on starting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christoph Egger Subject: curl: relocation error on starting Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:57:49 +0000 Size: 3260 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:13 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#771993: marked as done (feh: relocation error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcurl.so.4: symbol SSLv3_client_method, version OPENSSL_1.0.0 not defined in file libssl.so.1.0.0 with link time reference) References: <87bnnjan4u.fsf@jidanni.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding feh: relocation error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcurl.so.4: symbol SSLv3_client_method, version OPENSSL_1.0.0 not defined in file libssl.so.1.0.0 with link time reference to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: feh: relocation error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcurl.so.4: symbol SSLv3_client_method, version OPENSSL_1.0.0 not defined in file libssl.so.1.0.0 with link time reference Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:29:37 +0800 Size: 2609 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:16 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:16 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#787712: marked as done (libcurl: relocation error libcurl.so.4: symbol SSLv3_client_method) References: <20150604105227.4678.7624.reportbug@betty.enbd.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding libcurl: relocation error libcurl.so.4: symbol SSLv3_client_method to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Peter T. Breuer" Subject: libcurl: relocation error libcurl.so.4: symbol SSLv3_client_method Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:52:27 +0100 Size: 6098 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:15 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:15 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#781929: marked as done (deluge-gtk: version OPENSSL_1.0.0 not defined in file libssl.so.1.0.0 with link time reference) References: Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768476, regarding deluge-gtk: version OPENSSL_1.0.0 not defined in file libssl.so.1.0.0 with link time reference to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?UTF-8?B?c2hpcmlzaCDgpLbgpL/gpLDgpYDgpLc=?= Subject: deluge-gtk: version OPENSSL_1.0.0 not defined in file libssl.so.1.0.0 with link time reference Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 06:08:16 +0530 Size: 7711 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#768476: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7313 URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 8 19:03:20 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:03:20 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#782492: marked as done (FTCBFS for mips* architectures: invokes non-existent $triplet-$triplet-gcc) References: <20150413045331.GA14924@alf.mars> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#782492: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #782492, regarding FTCBFS for mips* architectures: invokes non-existent $triplet-$triplet-gcc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 782492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Helmut Grohne Subject: FTCBFS for mips* architectures: invokes non-existent $triplet-$triplet-gcc Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:53:32 +0200 Size: 8286 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Bug#782492: fixed in openssl 1.0.2d-2 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:00:16 +0000 Size: 7315 URL: From edi at gmx.de Fri Sep 11 18:24:31 2015 From: edi at gmx.de (Eduard Bloch) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:24:31 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#798690: handshake failure on get.docker.com Message-ID: <20150911182431.GA28056@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de> Package: libssl1.0.0 Severity: normal $ openssl s_client -connect get.docker.com:443 CONNECTED(00000003) 139902178879120:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure:s23_clnt.c:769: --- no peer certificate available --- No client certificate CA names sent --- SSL handshake has read 7 bytes and written 315 bytes --- New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE) Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE No ALPN negotiated --- I did the check above because my apt-cacher-ng recently started barking this error for no obvious reason. Search on internet is inconclusive... some people suggest to enforce TLSv1, other tell something about KeyUsage extension. I tried a code hack, change to SSL_CTX_new(TLSv1_1_client_method()) but that didn't help. Regards, Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- Hart ist Hart. Weich ist Weich. Aber immer weich ist hart. From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Sep 11 20:27:16 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:27:16 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#798690: marked as done (handshake failure on get.docker.com) References: <20150911202609.GA23451@roeckx.be> <20150911182431.GA28056@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: Your message dated Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:26:09 +0200 with message-id <20150911202609.GA23451 at roeckx.be> and subject line Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#798690: handshake failure on get.docker.com has caused the Debian Bug report #798690, regarding handshake failure on get.docker.com to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 798690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798690 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Eduard Bloch Subject: handshake failure on get.docker.com Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:24:31 +0200 Size: 4035 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#798690: handshake failure on get.docker.com Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:26:09 +0200 Size: 2058 URL: From noloader at gmail.com Sun Sep 20 19:52:34 2015 From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#799606: Cannot compile OpenSSL 1.0.2d under X32 (fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory) Message-ID: Package: openssl Version: 1.0.2d-1 Severity: important ***** >From within the X32 chroot environment (http://wiki.debian.org/X32Port)... Download and unpack OpenSSL with: curl -k https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz -o openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz tar xzfi openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz cd openssl-1.0.2d Then, configure: # See below for the output ./config Finally, make: # make making all in crypto... make[1]: Entering directory '/root/openssl-1.0.2d/crypto' /usr/bin/perl ../util/mkbuildinf.pl "gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wa,--noexecstack -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -O3 -Wall -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM" "linux-x86_64" >buildinf.h gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wa,--noexecstack -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -O3 -Wall -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -c -o cryptlib.o cryptlib.c In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0, from cryptlib.h:62, from cryptlib.c:117: /usr/include/features.h:374:25: fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. : recipe for target 'cryptlib.o' failed make[1]: *** [cryptlib.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/openssl-1.0.2d/crypto' Makefile:283: recipe for target 'build_crypto' failed make: *** [build_crypto] Error 1 ***** This could be a problem with the include paths for the standard library. Examining features.h and what's going on around the cdefs.h include: # cat /usr/include/features.h | grep -B 3 -A 2 cdefs\.h /* This is here only because every header file already includes this one. */ #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ # ifndef _SYS_CDEFS_H # include # endif And cdefs.h: # find /usr -name cdefs.h /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnux32/sys/cdefs.h And finally, how GCC was configured: # gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnux32/5/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnux32 Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 5.2.1-17' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-5 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-x32/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-x32 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-x32 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --enable-objc-gc --enable-multiarch --with-abi=mx32 --with-multilib-list=mx32,m64,m32 --enable-multilib --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnux32 --host=x86_64-linux-gnux32 --target=x86_64-linux-gnux32 Thread model: posix gcc version 5.2.1 20150911 (Debian 5.2.1-17) ***** Here is the interesting output from Configure: # ./config Operating system: x86_64-whatever-linux2 Configuring for linux-x86_64 Configuring for linux-x86_64 no-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 [default] OPENSSL_NO_EC_NISTP_64_GCC_128 (skip dir) no-gmp [default] OPENSSL_NO_GMP (skip dir) no-jpake [experimental] OPENSSL_NO_JPAKE (skip dir) no-krb5 [krb5-flavor not specified] OPENSSL_NO_KRB5 no-libunbound [experimental] OPENSSL_NO_LIBUNBOUND (skip dir) no-md2 [default] OPENSSL_NO_MD2 (skip dir) no-rc5 [default] OPENSSL_NO_RC5 (skip dir) no-rfc3779 [default] OPENSSL_NO_RFC3779 (skip dir) no-sctp [default] OPENSSL_NO_SCTP (skip dir) no-shared [default] no-ssl-trace [default] OPENSSL_NO_SSL_TRACE (skip dir) no-store [experimental] OPENSSL_NO_STORE (skip dir) no-unit-test [default] OPENSSL_NO_UNIT_TEST (skip dir) no-zlib [default] no-zlib-dynamic [default] IsMK1MF=0 CC =gcc CFLAG =-DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wa,--noexecstack -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -O3 -Wall -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM EX_LIBS =-ldl CPUID_OBJ =x86_64cpuid.o BN_ASM =x86_64-gcc.o x86_64-mont.o x86_64-mont5.o x86_64-gf2m.o rsaz_exp.o rsaz-x86_64.o rsaz-avx2.o EC_ASM =ecp_nistz256.o ecp_nistz256-x86_64.o DES_ENC =des_enc.o fcrypt_b.o AES_ENC =aes-x86_64.o vpaes-x86_64.o bsaes-x86_64.o aesni-x86_64.o aesni-sha1-x86_64.o aesni-sha256-x86_64.o aesni-mb-x86_64.o BF_ENC =bf_enc.o CAST_ENC =c_enc.o RC4_ENC =rc4-x86_64.o rc4-md5-x86_64.o RC5_ENC =rc5_enc.o MD5_OBJ_ASM =md5-x86_64.o SHA1_OBJ_ASM =sha1-x86_64.o sha256-x86_64.o sha512-x86_64.o sha1-mb-x86_64.o sha256-mb-x86_64.o RMD160_OBJ_ASM= CMLL_ENC =cmll-x86_64.o cmll_misc.o MODES_OBJ =ghash-x86_64.o aesni-gcm-x86_64.o ENGINES_OBJ = PROCESSOR = RANLIB =/usr/bin/ranlib ARFLAGS = PERL =/usr/bin/perl SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG mode DES_UNROLL used DES_INT used RC4_CHUNK is unsigned long created directory `include/openssl' ... ***** # uname -a Linux debian-8-x64 4.1.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.1.6-1 (2015-08-23) x86_64 GNU/Linux # lsb_release bash: lsb_release: command not found ***** # apt-cache show openssl Package: openssl Priority: optional Section: utils Installed-Size: 1118 Maintainer: Debian OpenSSL Team Architecture: x32 Version: 1.0.2d-1 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.16), libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.2~beta3) Suggests: ca-certificates Filename: pool-x32/main/o/openssl/openssl_1.0.2d-1_x32.deb Size: 701018 MD5Sum: e5fb058af84a8e73a5c9bcabc9856a5f SHA1: 48d9b85fc2af043bfc7dfcfcab540923193d103a SHA256: 5229523d19ab193fc7a130da7c68fb3be4abb0d5406ed6491f27784be2caabf0 SHA512: 01766108e3cc6572ddee7fb5a606fe99c9375389fb7c7eb1979383abe0d40edeee3792689a6a0c678cf1f8538e24bcc9d8424efdceaaba4bd4a265630129a965 Description: Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - cryptographic utility This package is part of the OpenSSL project's implementation of the SSL and TLS cryptographic protocols for secure communication over the Internet. . It contains the general-purpose command line binary /usr/bin/openssl, useful for cryptographic operations such as: * creating RSA, DH, and DSA key parameters; * creating X.509 certificates, CSRs, and CRLs; * calculating message digests; * encrypting and decrypting with ciphers; * testing SSL/TLS clients and servers; * handling S/MIME signed or encrypted mail. Description-md5: 9b6de2bb6e1d9016aeb0f00bcf6617bd From kurt at roeckx.be Sun Sep 20 20:25:13 2015 From: kurt at roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:25:13 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#799606: Bug#799606: Cannot compile OpenSSL 1.0.2d under X32 (fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150920202513.GA7325@roeckx.be> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > # find /usr -name cdefs.h > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnux32/sys/cdefs.h If you want to show include directories, you should show cpp -v, not gcc -v. But it's obvious why this doesn't work since you're telling it to build for amd64, not for x32. > # ./config > Operating system: x86_64-whatever-linux2 That is clearly not what you want. Your libc dev package at least doesn't match that. Please note that it's calling gcc with -m64, but you don't have the headers for that. Why are you reporting something about the upstream source to Debian while the Debian package build fine? It has an debian-x32 target that uses -mx32. I'm not sure there is a sane way to make config auto detect that you want x32. You should at least make uname -m report x32 instead of x86_64. If you remove the -m64 it might also just work for you, but I have no idea if it requires the -mx32 or not. Kurt From noloader at gmail.com Sun Sep 20 20:44:45 2015 From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#799606: Bug#799606: Cannot compile OpenSSL 1.0.2d under X32 (fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory) In-Reply-To: <20150920202513.GA7325@roeckx.be> References: <20150920202513.GA7325@roeckx.be> Message-ID: > Why are you reporting something about the upstream source to > Debian while the Debian package build fine? It has an debian-x32 > target that uses -mx32. > Debian wants all bugs reported to them, and not upstream. See "Don't file bugs upstream" at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. Jeff From noloader at gmail.com Sun Sep 20 23:06:47 2015 From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#799606: Bug#799606: Cannot compile OpenSSL 1.0.2d under X32 (fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory) In-Reply-To: <20150920202513.GA7325@roeckx.be> References: <20150920202513.GA7325@roeckx.be> Message-ID: On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >> # find /usr -name cdefs.h >> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnux32/sys/cdefs.h > > If you want to show include directories, you should show cpp -v, > not gcc -v. But it's obvious why this doesn't work since you're > telling it to build for amd64, not for x32. Ah, OK, thanks. When I see a configure that uses gcc by default, then I defer everything to the compiler driver since its the one that will be selecting the programs to run. > I'm not sure there is a sane way to make config auto detect that > you want x32. You should at least make uname -m report x32 > instead of x86_64. Hmmm.. OK. Should I bring this up with the Debian folks? They provide the platform; and if its not quite correct, then they should be the ones who correct it. Also, on Debian: # gcc -dumpmachine 2>&1 | grep x32 x86_64-linux-gnux32 So it appears to be detectable in a default configuration without the need to do anything special (at least on Debian). (Usually OS X experiences these types of pain points, not GNU Linux). Thanks again. Jeff From morph at debian.org Wed Sep 23 08:30:58 2015 From: morph at debian.org (Sandro Tosi) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:30:58 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] how to prevent libssl1.0.0:amd64 from asking to restart processes on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi! do you have any news for me? please, pretty please? :) On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hey! I'm preparing the migration from wheezy to jessie, and so I'm > trying to script/automate everything, including the debconf questions, > but I have a bit of a problem with libssl1.0.0:amd64 which keeps > asking me if it's ok to restart services even if I ran > > echo libssl1.0.0 libssl1.0.0/restart-services string true | > debconf-set-selections > echo libssl1.0.0:amd64 libssl1.0.0/restart-services string true | > debconf-set-selections > > before starting the installation (I got those values from > debconf-get-selections on a jessie machine). Do you know how should I > fix it? > > Thanks a ton in advance, > -- > Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) > My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ > Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi From editor at pakinsight.com Sat Sep 26 09:06:14 2015 From: editor at pakinsight.com (Pakistan) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 09:06:14 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-openssl-devel] 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Scientific Research Message-ID: Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://marketing.pakinsight.com/display.php?M=512339&C=9aee6c79fce2d53442f716b9eba92de4&S=11&L=12&N=6 To stop receiving these emails:http://marketing.pakinsight.com/unsubscribe.php?M=512339&C=9aee6c79fce2d53442f716b9eba92de4&L=12&N=11 Powered by Hairyspire -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: