[pkg-otr-team] gbp vs. 1.0 source format

[micah]

Wow, great to see this take off so quickly. In fact, so quickly that I
have not been able to keep up!

intrigeri <intrigeri at debian.org> writes:
> The only problem I've spotted today with source format 1.0 + applying
> patches directly in the packaging branch is that it makes it harder to
> track what changes have been forwarded and/or applied upstream, and
> which have not. To mitigate this a bit, I propose we try hard to
> immediately forward upstream any patch we have to apply (done that
> once today already).

Everything looks great, and I don't want to bikeshed at this point after
everything has already been decided and uploads have even happened, but
I wanted to just register that I find source format 1.0 a bit strange of
a choice to me. To me this will be a little bit of a challenge, I would
have preferred 3 myself.

micah
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 930 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-otr-team/attachments/20140220/ddac1e22/attachment.sig>