<html><head></head><body><div>Hi Paul,</div><div class="-x-evo-signature-wrapper"><span><pre><br></pre></span></div><div>On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 21:51 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Hi,
On 06-02-16 19:20, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
I think it makes sense to have fpmkunit in fp-units-misc instead of
fp-units-base. But this will break backward compatibility while if we
put libtar in fp-units-base then it might be lesser issues of backward
compatibility as I think there are less pacakges depending on libtar
than depending on fpmkunit.
So I'd say let's fall back to your first proposal and put libtar in
fp-units-base. This will cause for sure less backward compatibility
issues and also makes sense as paszlib is of the same functionality and
is there anyway.
</blockquote>
Seems like we have to update the description of the -misc-* package as
that says that PasZlib is in there, not in -base-*. Looks like this has
been the case since the start of our archive.
</pre></blockquote><div>I'll update the description and do the files move if you did not do it already.</div><div>-- </div><pre>Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir</pre></body></html>