<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#2e3436" link="#2a76c6" vlink="#2e3436"><div>Hi Paul,</div><div><br></div><div>I don't thin we should bother about upstream debs as they are completely different, we don't support mixing of both usptream and our debs.</div><div><br></div><div>The only thing we can support is new upstream in as sort as possible delay.</div><div><span><pre><pre>-- <br></pre>Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
</pre></span></div><div><br></div><div>On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 10:13 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Forgot one thing.
On 18-11-16 10:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
Whatever the logic behind the versioning,
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Upstream released their release candidates of the 1.6 branch without the
.0 and I stuck with that when 1.6.0 came out due to packaging reasons.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list
<a href="mailto:Pkg-pascal-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org">Pkg-pascal-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pascal-devel">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pascal-devel</a>
</pre></blockquote></body></html>