Bug#393478: marked as done (libcrypt-des-perl: FTBFS: Is the Build-Depends on libcrypt-cbc-perl really necessary?)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Sat Mar 17 21:12:04 UTC 2007


Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:11:37 +0200
with message-id <20070317201137.GA12116 at rispa.it.helsinki.fi>
and subject line Bug#393478: libcrypt-des-perl: FTBFS: Is the Build-Depends on libcrypt-cbc-perl really necessary?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Andreas Jochens <aj at andaco.de>
Subject: libcrypt-des-perl: FTBFS: Is the Build-Depends on libcrypt-cbc-perl
	really necessary?
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:43:25 +0200
Size: 2022
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20070317/33590698/attachment.mht
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Niko Tyni <ntyni at iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Bug#393478: libcrypt-des-perl: FTBFS: Is the Build-Depends on
	libcrypt-cbc-perl really necessary?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:11:37 +0200
Size: 3065
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20070317/33590698/attachment-0001.mht


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list