Some of your Debian packages might need attention

gregor herrmann gregor+debian at comodo.priv.at
Mon Nov 26 20:44:01 UTC 2007


On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:35:16 +0000, Peter Makholm wrote:

> > Hm, I'm a little surprised:
> I was a bit surprised too but it is explained on
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
> It seems that DDPO doesn't support the versioning information used by
> the BTS.

Thanks for the hint but actually I cannot find this on the wiki page;
it just says that the BTS uses version tracking.
Maybe I'm getting this wrong but if DdpoByMail ignores versioning
information it should "see" that the bug is closed; and otherwise too
:)

Cheers,
gregor, still confused
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Sting: We'll Be Together
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20071126/df6512e3/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list