Bug#464302: libmodule-load-conditional-perl: FTBFS: perl-modules: non-matching version installed (5.8.8-12 ! >> 5.10)

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 06/02/08 at 21:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> If you want to ask me something, please put me in to "To:" or "Cc:", or
> use 464302-submitter at bugs.debian.org. Submitters don't receive answers
> automatically.
> 
> On 06/02/08 at 10:39 -0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> > 
> > On Feb 6, 2008 6:02 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> > > Package: libmodule-load-conditional-perl
> > 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
> > >
> > > Relevant part:
> > >
> > >  > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > >  > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 6)
> > >  > Build-Depends-Indep: liblocale-maketext-simple-perl, libmodule-load-perl, libparams-check-perl, perl (>= 5), perl-modules (>> 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69)
> > 
> > >  > perl: already installed (5.8.8-12 >= 5 is satisfied)
> > >  > perl-modules: non-matching version installed (5.8.8-12 ! >> 5.10)
> > >  > Default version of perl-modules not sufficient, no suitable alternative found. I probably should dep-wait this one.
> > 
> > It seems that your builder is not correctly interpreting the depends,
> > as they are perfectly satisfiable in unstable.
> 
> Is it possible that your definition of unstable include experimental?  :-)

Oh, you meant that perl-modules (>> 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69) is
satisfiable by installing libversion-perl from unstable? sbuild doesn't
do that, unfortunately. Couldn't you write libversion-perl |
perl-modules, so that it works with sbuild?
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |