[Dehs-devel] libxml-sax-perl: New upstream version available
atomo64 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 01:56:28 UTC 2008
Sorry for the late response, I accidentally archive the conversation
and got lost.
On 02/03/2008, Martín Ferrari <martin.ferrari at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Raphael Geissert <atomo64 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > How's that? that seems like a broken behaviour of svn-inject
> The two things go together. The repack script renames to the version
> informed by uscan, and later svn-inject takes whichever version is in
> the filename.
Can't the repack script just append dfsg where/when needed?
I still disagree on appending dfsg via uversionmangle.
> > I plan to go the former way after version=4 watch files are accepted
> > on uscan, which will by default strip dfsg and similar Debian
> > repackaging signs via dversionmangle.
> Well, I find it silly to misreport problems when packages are
> correctly following the uscan rules.
But despite my very strong disagreement the other day I added an
exception to DEHS so it doesn't perform the 'extended stripping' when
dfsg is matched in the upstream version reported by uscan.
Really, I recommend you (and anyone else being used to using
uversionmangle that way) to fix the repack/or whatever script so it
appends dfsg when needed instead of relying on uscan's uversionmagle.
> Martín Ferrari
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard.
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers