development versions
gregor herrmann
gregoa at debian.org
Thu Jun 4 15:56:49 UTC 2009
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:17:39 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > One question that comes to my mind: Should we change the existing
> > watch files in svn?
> I think that yes, unless there is evidence that developer version is
> what is currently packaged.
No objections from my side, and I hope someone who cares enough about
it will do a nice mass commit :)
> TBH, what bothers me more is that dh-make-perl has accumulated a great
> pile of changes and TODO since 0.55 and uploading 0.56 right now may
> spread havoc :) OTOH, if people suffer from bugs I have introduced,
> they may consider helping to fix them :)
I'd say: go for it.
There are a few TODO items and I guess a few rough edges in the new
dependency resolving code but I haven't seen any actual explosions,
and the results are for sure better than before.
And we could close an RC bug.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Phil Collins: We Said Hello Goodbye
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20090604/99080acb/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list