Bug#539019: removal of libmd5-perl
gregor herrmann
gregoa at debian.org
Sun Nov 29 19:47:58 UTC 2009
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:36:45 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > What is the best way to proceed? I would increase the severity of the
> > bug reports for packages depending on or recommending libmd5-perl to
> > important with a note that we will soon ask for removal of libmd5-perl.
> > After two weeks, we could ask for removal of libmd5-perl from unstable
> > and then raise the severity to serious as the packages would no longer
> > be installable or violate policy (recommending a package not in main).
> Sounds good.
Ack.
> I think that NMUs can be used to close the upgraded bugs
> after some additional time (two weeks seems to be the universal unit).
> After these NMUs land in the archive, the removal request should be
> processed without problems.
IIRC the ftp-masters remove packages more or less immediately, but at
least without waiting for rdepends to be fixed. They'd have to wait
for too long I guess :)
But that doesn't change the procedure; after removal the other
packages are buggy and someone[tm] has to either fix or remove them.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Tanita Tikaram: Trouble
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20091129/cc60eb7c/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list