Bug#773873: libidna-punycode-perl: dead code - replaced by liburi-perl
Axel Beckert
abe at debian.org
Wed Dec 24 17:25:12 UTC 2014
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> No packages depend on libidna-punycode-perl - candidate for removal?
> >
> > Popcon shows about 35-45 installations with around 5 activity votes.
> >
> > IMHO that are too many installations for a removal without RC bug, but
> > likely a removal candidate if it catches a non-trivial RC bug in the
> > future.
>
> Fair enough - but I do believe it effectively means we take over as
> upstream, and should then adapt packaging to reflect that - not
> repackage as dpkg source format "3.0 (native)", but have Homepage, watch
> file and debian/copyright source URLs point to our resources at Alioth.
I disagree. As long as there's no major issue for the package in Sid...
> It must've happened before among our thousands of packages - do we have
> formalized some procedures for which actions we should remember to take,
> and how we then monitor its health? Do we e.g. push to CPAN and monitor
> tkwalitee and cpantesters.org, also against Windows and Mac?
I think that's all totally overkill.
> As a minimum, I guess it makes sense to keep this bug open,
Yes. I though would lower the severity to minor.
> and 45 hits on popcon is not enough for me to volunteer as new
> upstream for code I see no need for,
And I see no need for that effort.
> even if bugfree...
For me, that makes quite some difference.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list