Bug#752797: libconfig-model-perl: Should split library from command

gregor herrmann gregoa at debian.org
Thu Jul 3 18:39:51 UTC 2014


On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:33:53 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> > I'm a bit ambivalent ...
> >
> > On one hand, I also think that a separete package for a script which 
> > then depends on on the rest anyway is overkill and bloats the Packages 
> > file and everything.
> How does this differ from, say, libtiff-tools or openjpeg-tools?  

My gut says:
cme is a tiny part (size-wise) of libconfig-model-perl, and it's
important to have it installed.

My brain says:
I have no arguments to counter your logic :)

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Muff Potter: Der Pfadfinder-Knochenfabrik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 928 bytes
Desc: Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20140703/c96852bc/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list