[Pkg-phototools-devel] hugin

[Cyril Brulebois]

On 30/12/2007, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hmm. Strange, I have been using a backport of Ubuntu's
> 0.7~beta4-0ubuntu3 on etch[1], built and linked against libpano12-dev
> 2.8.3, without any evidence of a failed dlopen.

I'm getting this:
Couln't open pano13

and I believe the problem I had previously was actually a segfault
occuring afterwards.  I'm unable to reproduce it using the same set
of photographs, though.

Speaking on hugin, I'm not decided yet with the best course of action
about the following topic:
 - should I move the desktop file from -data to -bin to ship it along
   with the binary it lists in its “Exec” key, and add a Conflicts
   against previous versions to ensure the upgrade goes smoothly?
 - or should I keep the desktop file in the -data package, and add a
   lintian override about it not being a bug because of the Depends from
   -bin towards -data?

1. looks cleaner to me, even given the needed Conflicts. Thoughts?

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20080103/9786333f/attachment.pgp