[Pkg-phototools-devel] [RFC] Packaging notes for hugin

[Sebastian Harl]

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> But I've been graphing the binary dependencies (binaries under /usr/bin
> and shared objects), and I don't really see how it would interesting to
> eventually separate the tools, that's why I'm thinking of rather merging
> hugin-{bin,tools} into hugin (keeping hugin-data as it is) than keeping
> the current packaging scheme.

Yes, please, at least, merge hugin-bin into hugin. I've always wondered why
this has been done this way - I really don't see any benefit from that. If the
tools shipped with hugin-tools might be used apart from hugin, I think it
makes sense to keep them in a separate package (as far as I can see there are
no dependencies from hugin-tools to any other hugin packages) - if that's not
currently the case, I'd suggest merging this package into hugin as well.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20080127/f4c13410/attachment.pgp