[Pkg-phototools-devel] udev rules ???_prefixes
md at Linux.IT
Fri Jul 11 10:21:48 UTC 2008
On Jul 11, Mark Purcell <msp at debian.org> wrote:
> Is this policy/ best practice documented?
The note about using symlinks has been removed from README.Debian and
now the new prefixes are listed there.
But you could as well say "Md said so"...
> Should bugs be filed against packages which still do this:
Not for the prefixes if the current rules work, maybe for the symlinks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20080711/1711e085/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel