[Pkg-phototools-devel] Thoughts about libgphoto2?

[Cyril Brulebois]

Sebastian Harl <sh at tokkee.org> (20/07/2008):
> > I think it's a package that would be a quite good candidate for
> > backports.org, so that people can fetch it from there to get better
> > and better camera support with each and every release.
> 
> Agreed.

Nice, will do. I'll probably start with an experimental upload of 2.4.2
(so that we can still fix bugs in 2.4.1 for lenny) once I'm done with
other packages.

> > I plan to walk through its bug list next week anyway. Also, I think
> > I'll wait until 2.4.1-1 is in testing before eventually uploading a
> > -2 with would fix #491065. The change is quite minimal and might be
> > granted a freeze exception if RT people consider it's needed for
> > lenny.
> 
> Sounds good to me.

I did so, also backporting a patch as suggested by upstream, which is
only about using quicksort to speedup startup time (20 lines diff).

Uploading in time for lenny, should be OK freeze-wise.

Thanks for your comments.

Mraw,
KiBi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20080726/345b77b6/attachment.pgp