[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#502721: Bug#502721: hugin 0.7.0 package built for Ubuntu Intrepid

Cyril Brulebois kibi at debian.org
Wed Nov 5 20:35:49 UTC 2008


fabrice <coutadeurf at gmail.com> (05/11/2008):
> As I added dependency on enfuse, which only exists since 3.2, it's a
> kind of an implicit dependency with 3.2.

No. That'll make sure that the source package used to build this package
was 3.2; not that you're installing a 3.2 version of enblend (think of
having e.g. unstable + experimental repositories, both enblend 3.0 and
3.2 will be available, and nothing will force you to pick 3.2).

Of course, if enfuse depended on enblend >= 3.2, that would be another
story…

> But you are right: it's better to have it clearly identify as depend
> on 3.2

… and I would still go for the explicit dependency, too.

Mraw,
KiBi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20081105/01497f7c/attachment-0001.pgp 


More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list