[Pkg-phototools-devel] Fwd: Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages

[Andreas Beckmann]

Dear maintainers,

you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid
of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability.
Ensure to build in a really clean sid chroot, otherwise another binNMU
could be required to "fix" your package and break MA co-installability
again.

If you file an unblock request, you should include a *binary* debdiff to
the packages in testing, too, to ensure no library dependencies from
unstable get picked up.


On 2013-04-27 10:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied,
>> but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful
>> no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability.
>> I've identified 8 source packages where this would help:
>>  bogl
>>  clutter-gst
>>  libdmtx
>>  libftdi
>>  libopenraw
>>  libpano13
>>  lua-sql
>>  myodbc
>
> Note that such issues are not RC for wheezy. If the maintainers are
> interested in fixing them, I might be minded to accept such changes, but
> it would need to be /very/ soon. I have to admit to being concerned
> about changes that might be introduced by a rebuild of a package in
> unstable after several months though...

On 2013-04-27 10:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Alternatively, we can look at fixing these issues for the first point
> release. That gives us more time to evaluate any potential side-effects
> of the rebuilds.


Andreas

PS: libdmtx would have to go via t-p-u, I'll look into this in more
detail because there is another issue, too