[php-maint] Packaging php-pear from PEAR

Jan Wagner waja at cyconet.org
Mon Oct 1 08:26:00 UTC 2007

On Monday 01 October 2007 10:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:45:55AM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 September 2007 09:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I don't think it's a good idea to have decisions about pear being made
> > > autonomously from the php packages.
> >
> > could you please raise objections (beside a separate source package in
> > pool)?
> Huh?

The question, which comes to my mind ... what are the disadvantages of 
separating pear and php packages? (There is no valuation in the question)

With kind regards, Jan.
Never write mail to <waja at spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-php-maint/attachments/20071001/1ea15d7b/attachment.pgp 

More information about the pkg-php-maint mailing list