<html><head></head><body>Fwiw, I'm not saying packages must not use the postgresql namespace, I'd just leave it to the maintainer to decide.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<br>
Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org> schrieb:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif">Hello Ansgar, Christoph,<br /><br />Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:<br />> The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)<br /><br />Right, postgresql-X.Y-foo are server-side plugins which are specific<br />to a major PostgreSQL server version. They need to be versioned just<br />like PostgreSQL itself for upgrades, parallel installability, etc.<br /><br />> which follow the example of postgresql-plperl-x.y (built from PG<br />> core). For real applications like barman, that's not really<br />> necessary.<br /><br />Where "real applications" == client-side PostgreSQL users, i. e. which<br />only use libpq, not build against postgresql-server-dev-X.Y.<br /><br />Martin<br />-- <br />Martin Pitt | <a href="http://www.piware.de">http://www.piware.de</a><br />Ubuntu Developer (<a href="http://www.ubuntu.com">www.ubuntu.com</a>) | Debian
Developer (<a href="http://www.debian.org">www.debian.org</a>)<br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>