RFH: pulseaudio -- PulseAudio sound server

[Felipe Sateler]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd at luon.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 20:02 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just subscribed to the list in response to this bug. I'd like to
> > help as my time permits. Please add me to the team in alioth, my
> > username is fsateler.
>
> Added you.
>
> > I've glanced at the bug list and it looks to me that many bugs have
> > not had any activity (maintainer or otherwise) in over 2 years. I
> > think bugs that are too old should be closed (with a ping first,
> > maybe) so that the bug list becomes useful again.
>
> Go for it :)

OK, so here is the result of my work so far. Some bugs were previously
classified, but not too many.

I have closed several bugs, around 80 if [1] is to be believed (didn't
keep track, sorry).

4 bugs confirmed.
1 bug tagged as wontfix (autospawn is evil). This may change if we can
enable systemd user interaction (there is a patch proposed upstream).
16 bugs still unclassified.
50 bugs tagged moreinfo
6 forwarded bugs

14 bugs are tagged "from other branch", which means they were reported
against a stable version. Of those, most are tagged moreinfo (plus one
done and one pending).


I'd like to close all the bugs tagged moreinfo that have not answered
the moreinfo request (I sent a mail on each bug that I tagged
moreinfo). If the bugs are still present then they can be reopened,
but now they do not really help us improve pulseaudio if no response
appears.

I propose closing all bugs that match the following criteria:

1. Tagged moreinfo
2. Last mail over 1 month old.
3. Last mail is by us.

What do you think?

[1] http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/p/pulseaudio.png


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler