[request-tracker-maintainers] rt-3.6.1 release and filing ITP

Niko Tyni ntyni at iki.fi
Fri Sep 1 09:52:28 UTC 2006


On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:31:17PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
 
> I'll file an ITP straight away; can't see any reason why not.

On second thoughts, seeing the discussion from the 3.4 ITP wrt.
packaging different versions of RT separately:

 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg00019.html

I think I'd like to hear some comments on these first:

> I wonder if this should go into unstable or experimental first? There
> have been a few interested users who could test it from experimental,
> but I guess the audience is otherwise very limited... maybe straight
> to unstable is the way to go.
> 
> I suppose we'll have both 3.4 and 3.6 in etch, as it seems too late
> to drop 3.4. I think we should adopt 3.4 as well, it's still on the QA
> group's hands.

Do people agree here, or should we go with just 3.4 in etch, or something
else?

Cheers,
-- 
Niko Tyni	ntyni at iki.fi



More information about the pkg-request-tracker-maintainers mailing list