[request-tracker-maintainers] rt-3.6.1 release and filing ITP

[Jacob Helwig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Sep 1, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:

>
> I think that going straight to unstable with a set of
> request-tracker-3.6 packages is the way to go, in this case
> _especially_ if we want to have enough exposure before freezing etch.
>

I agree that we should release straight to unstable.  I would like to  
see 3.6 have a chance at getting into Etch.

>
> Currently, I can't say how much work it would be to bring 3.4 up to
> par, but otherwise, I'd like to see both in Etch.
>

After this weekend I should be able to put some time into 3.4, to  
help get it ready.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFE+Gxt7+WTDGayw0URAqiyAKCEGkO29Yg9aDm198A3o9WVxKmyJgCfae1C
m/Ac2bWAaVvhO21KWuPUjFU=
=gxWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----