[request-tracker-maintainers] rt-3.6.1 release and filing ITP

[Niko Tyni]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:

> >I wonder if this should go into unstable or experimental first? There
> >have been a few interested users who could test it from experimental,
> >but I guess the audience is otherwise very limited... maybe straight
> >to unstable is the way to go.
> 
> Either is fine by me.

Well, as Toni said, uploading to unstable is probably the only way to
get enough testing for etch, so let's do that.

> >I suppose we'll have both 3.4 and 3.6 in etch, as it seems too late
> >to drop 3.4. I think we should adopt 3.4 as well, it's still on the QA
> >group's hands.
> 
> I think that's all wise.  I'm very much in favour of keeping both at  
> the moment.  My experiences here with trying to upgrade a test 3.4  
> instance 3.6 have not been very smooth, or successful.  I think we'd  
> be inviting a world of pain if we try to remove 3.4 in the near  
> future.  Also given the sorts of environments in which people tend to  
> use RT, they are likely to want parallel installations of both, and  
> we should probably just provide a script to help people move data  
> from one to the other when they're ready.

OK, I think we're all on the same page then. Great.

FWIW, I think the 3.4.5-1 in SVN is ready for an upload. The biggest
work is going through the open bugs in the BTS.

Cheers,
-- 
Niko