[Pkg-roundcube-maintainers] pristine-tar or not pristine-tar? repackaged tarballs?

[Vincent Bernat]

OoO En  ce début  d'après-midi nuageux du  samedi 01 octobre  2011, vers
14:29, Jérémy Bobbio <lunar at debian.org> disait :

> It looks like the upload of Roundcube version 0.5.4+dfsg-1 was made
> without using pristine-tar for the new upstream tarball. Was that
> intended?

> If the 'dfsg' tag in the version number is a marker that these tarballs
> are different than upstream ones. Vincent, is there a documentation
> explaining how?

> Adding a README.source file might be appropriate in describing how to
> create a new repackaged tarball when upstream releases a new version.

Yes, it  is modified. I  have dropped swf  file from tinymce  because we
don't know its license (and there is no source for it). Unfortunately, I
just  did the  same thing  for 0.6  (which does  not ship  the  SWF file
anymore but a new one instead,  without source too). In fact, in git, we
should have created a branch "dfsg".

BTW, could you test  roundcube 0.6 that I just pushed to  git? I was not
able  to test  it since  my test  installation is  broken. I  will retry
tomorrow but if you can test an upgrade, that would be wonderful.
-- 
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im

Terminate input by end-of-file or marker, not by count.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-roundcube-maintainers/attachments/20111002/3dc1e14c/attachment.pgp>