[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] librmagick-ruby override disparity

[Paul van Tilburg]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:27:35PM +0000, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:02:18PM -0800, Debian Installer wrote:
> > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> > override file for the following file(s):
> > 
> > librmagick-ruby-doc_1.10.0-1_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says interpreters.
> > librmagick-ruby1.8_1.10.0-1_powerpc.deb: package says section is graphics, override says interpreters.
> > librmagick-ruby_1.10.0-1_all.deb: package says section is graphics, override says interpreters.
> 
> Did we solve this?[*]

So apparently, we did not.  I talked with some guys on #debian (under
which vorlon and Jeroen van de Woffelaar).  And he suggests that all
bindings or any other ruby _libs_ go into libs, our doc packages in docs
and apps go into their representive section (graphic app in graphics,
network app in network, etc.).  To cite Jeroen:

<jvw> it's a 'library' -> a piece of code, intended to be plug and
      played for useage in some bigger app

I think we should most definitely bring this up for the Ruby Policy
discussion. Meanwhile I want to have a quick decision on what to
do with this package, since it solves FTBS bugs.
* Leave all at 'interpreters'?
* Set it to libs/doc?
* Set it to graphics/doc?

Paul

-- 
Student @ Eindhoven                         | email: paulvt at debian.org
University of Technology, The Netherlands   | JID: paul at luon.net
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20060212/042bedbc/attachment.pgp