[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] r345 -
lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net
Sun Feb 19 19:48:06 UTC 2006
On 18/02/06 at 09:57 +0000, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:37:36AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 18/02/06 at 09:18 +0000, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:36:03PM +0000, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Log:
> > > > feed2imap 0.7-1 prepared ; ready for upload
> > >
> > > E: feed2imap's version 0.7 is not available
> > > (in /usr/share/ruby-pkg-tools/pkg-ruby-extras.sources).
> > > E: No source tarball found for package feed2imap-0.7.
> > Maybe it would be a good idea to implement something such as source
> > retrieval using debian/watch in pkg-ruby-get-source (if debian/watch
> > exists) ?
> I have suggested this before, but got received no comments.
> That is, I recall someone dismissing it with an argument, but cannot find
> any trace of it in archives or logs.
> It should be feasable since uscan shares a similar goal.
> It would certainly solve the where-to-put-the-sources-list problem.
> 1: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/2005-November/000089.html
Should be easily doable:
***lucas at blop:~/dev/pkg-ruby-extras/packages/feed2imap/trunk$ uscan --dehs
<status>up to date</status>
But it would be interesting to know what was the argument against it.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
More information about the pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers