[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] Documentation generation

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 28/12/05 at 13:15 +0000, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 05:38:56PM +0000, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 2) We will be using, then, upstream documentation generation options,
> > > instead of the ones we decide to use.
> > > 
> > > So, after a little thought, I think we should better call rdoc directly,
> > > with the options we decide (I think Lucas had a proposal in some thread).
> > > The options, of course, will be overridable via make variables or
> > > something similar.
> > 
> > Yes, well, we could use a wrapper.  I wrote something about that on the
> > Wiki already:
> > http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki/index.cgi?DocumentationGeneration
> > Anyway, it's still kinda calling rdoc directly.  My original version of the
> > CDBS class supported generating or installing RI (to the site RI 1.8 dir)
> > and HTML (to /usr/share/doc/<pkg>/rdoc/ for consistency) and that seemed
> > to work well.
> 
>     I've just committed an initial version to the SVN. Please test it and tell
> me what you think. I've also modified the CDBS class to automatically call
> dh_rdoc for -doc packages.
 
Why is dh_rdoc written in perl ? :-)
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |