[DRE-maint] Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

Gunnar Wolf gwolf at gwolf.org
Thu Jan 24 00:01:59 UTC 2008


Filipe dijo [Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:44:57PM -0200]:
> >>That is good!  I always would have liked for libactiverecord-ruby to be
> >>separate from Rails.
> 
> Me too! But.. It would be interesting if rails source package provided
> this package. Why don't you try to talk with rails package maintainer to
> break rails package in many small packages, nd make rails depend on
> them? This way things are beatiful.
> 
> Otherwise if you install ruby and active record you will have the same files
> at /usr/share/rails/activerecord/lib and /usr/lib/ruby/1.8 , and for
> sure someone wil have problems with this (loading wrong files with
> rails, etc).
> 
> But if the rails guy do not want to split, then go for it...

Hi,

I recently (Jan 11) wrote a mail to Adam Majer, the Rails maintainer -
In fact, I'll copy the message I sent to him here (and add him as Cc):

/-------------------------------------------------
| Hi,
| 
| I am using Rails for several of my systems, and I think that, even
| though I'm overworked and short on time, I can help you comaintaining
| Rails, if you are interested. My first intention would be to upload
| Rails 2.x to etch-backports, and (looking at the bug reports) to split
| the binary packages on its constituent(?) parts. And, of course, my
| scarce free time would only be added to yours ;-)
| 
| So, what do you say, can I become co-maintainer?
| 
| Taking even a (maybe large?) step more: Would you consider putting
| Rails under the pkg-ruby-extras group? That'd give an easier
| collaboration (as everything is done via the SVN repo) and more hands
| to work on tough things.
\-------------------------------------------------

So... Well, I am among the interested in working towards the stated
goals ;-) Adam, what do you say?

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - gwolf at gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20080123/fde927d2/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list