[DRE-maint] RFS sinatra_0.9.3-1
lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net
Wed Jul 22 09:22:47 UTC 2009
On 20/07/09 at 23:12 +0200, Laurent Vallar wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> On Mon,Jul,20,2009, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > [...]
> > If a lib is called libfoo-ruby, one always has to wonder whether the
> > source package is libfoo-ruby, foo-ruby, ruby-foo, rfoo, foo4r, etc.
> > I know one can do some queries to find out the source package, but as
> > packager I'd like the consisting naming.
> > Why do I bring this up now? Well, because it's easy to rename
> > source packages before the first upload. Let me know if anyone
> > disagrees with the old convention, I'm sure we can work it out.
> > [...]
> You're right, the first try was a package called 'sinatra'. But after
> reading latest Candidate new Ruby policy (v2) from Lucas, i changed the
> target names.
> cf. http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2009/04/msg00023.html
I think that what Paul means is that he would prefer the source package
name to be libsinatra-ruby, not just sinatra.
I don't have a preference for one or the other solution.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers