[DRE-maint] redmine package questions

[Tobias Grimm]

Jérémy Lal wrote:

> So i'm wondering if i'd better follow the work of Richard and name the
> package after the svn revision, or should i simply name the package
> 0.9.0-x, incrementing x until upstream releases 0.9.0 ?

0.9.0-x wouldn't work. You could use a tilde, so that: 0.9.0~x-1 < 0.9.0-1
But this might be better used only with real release candidate versions
(something like 0.9.0~rc1)

Personally I would vote for an SVN version which includes the date:
0.8.4+svn20090604.2778

> debconf scripts so that a default install would at least provide a working
> default configuration on apache2 or lighttpd. Should i forget that and just
> provide examples of www configs, letting the web admin do his work ?

+1 for the examples approach

Tobias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20090605/7ef7ef45/attachment.pgp>