<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 27/04/2015 10:43, Angus Lees a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPA_H3fXXUeCh17mGigt0EeRjarD3ByYtYnnbwQyk6WBsP31_Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 at 17:17 Sylvestre
Ledru <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sylvestre@debian.org">sylvestre@debian.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>I like the idea and I think it makes sense.<br>
I am just afraid about the libstd-$hash having to
through new every time...<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This shouldn't be any different to regular lib$soname
bumps for C-based packages.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Except that they will change at every release for a while, don't you
think?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPA_H3fXXUeCh17mGigt0EeRjarD3ByYtYnnbwQyk6WBsP31_Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> I haven't maintained a C library package before, but
afaik you only go through the NEW process for new source
packages, not renamed binary packages.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
No, ditto for renamed binaries.<br>
<br>
S<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>