[Pkg-samba-maint] Differences between control and control.in in svn trunk

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:13:06PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There are some differences between control and control.in in the svn
> trunk, besides the obvious @libacl@ substitution.  I haven't thought
> hard enough to determine whether this affects the build, but it should
> be fixed at least for clarity's sake.

They do affect the build, because at least one of these changes involves a
hand-edit of control which will be overwritten at build-time when control is
regenerated. :/

Could you add this change to control.in and regenerate control in the svn
tree?

> --- control.in  2005-12-03 12:36:30.000000000 +0100
> +++ control     2005-12-03 12:33:11.000000000 +0100
> @@ -166,7 +165,7 @@
>  Section: net
>  Priority: optional
>  Architecture: any
> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
> +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, samba-common (= ${Source-Version})
>  Replaces: samba (<= 2.2.3-2)
>  Description: service to resolve user and group information from Windows NT servers
>   This package provides the winbindd daemon, which provides a

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20051203/5af0674b/attachment.pgp