[Pkg-samba-maint] Merging more Ubuntu changes?
bubulle at debian.org
Tue Dec 19 06:59:04 UTC 2006
Quoting Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic (mom at ubuntu.com):
> * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
Many of these could probably be merged back after the release of Etch:
> * debian/smb.conf:
> - Do not show the version number by default
I tend to agree with that one. Seeing all these "(samba x.y.z)"
servers on my network is annying..:-)
> - Comment out the default [homes] shares and add more verbose comments to
> explain what they do and how they work (closes: launchpad.net/27608)
ie not sharing homes by default....Any comments from other team members?
> - Add a "valid users = %S" stanza to the commented-out [homes] section,
> to show users how to restrict access to \\server\username to only
> - Change the (commented-out) "printer admin" example to use "@lpadmin"
> instead of "@ntadmin", since the lpadmin group is used for spool admin.
> * debian/panic-action:
> - Alter the panic-action script to encourage users to report their
> bugs in Ubuntu packages to Ubuntu, rather than reporting to Debian.
> Modify text to more closely match the Debian script
We could maybe make part of this script more easily configurable for
CDD by using variable parts that could be setup in /etc/default/samba
> * debian/samba-common.templates:
> - Set default workgroup to MSHOME
Well, the current "DEBIAN_FANS" we have sounds a bit childish to
me. However, I'm unsure abnout the choice of "MSHOME" by Ubuntu...
> * debian/control:
> - remove typehandling
> - add update-inetd to Depends
Should be investigated.
> * debian/patches/VERSION.patch:
> - set SAMBA_VERSION_VENDOR_SUFFIX to Ubuntu
> * debian/samba-common.config:
> - do not change priority to HIGH if dhclient3 is installed
Interesting change. To be discussed
> * debian/samba.init:
> - use of PIDDIR instead of hardcoding it
We should adopt that one
> - Munge our init script to deal with the fact that our implementation
> (or lack thereof) of log_daemon_msg and log_progress_msg differs
> from Debian's implementation of the same (Ubuntu #19691)
> * debian/rules:
> - remove type-handling
Should be investigated
> - properly clean on make clean
Would be interesting to know more about what is not clean
> - do not install mount.cifs and umount.cifs as suid
Well, that would be a regression for our users. Should we ask a
debconf question about this ?
> * debian/patches/ubuntu-auxsrc.patch:
> - some auxilliary sources (undocumented in previous changelogs)
> * debian/patches/ubuntu-fix-ldap.patch:
> - fix LDAP backend, see Ubuntu #1905, Debian #274155
Seems to be mergeable...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20061219/86cae93b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint