[Pkg-samba-maint] ucf for smb.conf?

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon at debian.org):
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:13:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:09:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Does anyone have opinions on whether ucf is appropriate here?  Or is it to
> > > me to present a trial implementation? :)
> 
> > Maybe one like the attached diff, then?
> 
> And by "the attached diff", I mean this one.


Yikes. I never used ucf myself so I'm not really sure that my advice
has some value.

I overread your patch and found nothing awful (are you
surprised?). IMHO, it's probably OK to jump into it an put that nice
piece of work in production.

Indeed, ucf seems pretty cool *and easy* to use.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20071214/a734797c/attachment.pgp