[Pkg-samba-maint] Upcoming possible licensing issues kde vs samba
Sune at vuorela.dk
Tue Nov 13 23:09:51 UTC 2007
On Sunday 11 November 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:44:48PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > I'd of course prefer any solution that allows us to upload samba 3.2.0
> > > as soon as upstream releases it. Jerry, any schedule for the release
> > > of 3.2.0? You will probably release some rc versions, right?
> > We'll need maintain both samba versions in the archive or at least
> > current libsmbclient, that is what kde needs.
> We will certainly not be maintaining both samba versions in the archive.
> Keeping around the current libsmbclient is probably ok.
Is parts of the smbclient package also what you consider being libsmbclient ?
It seems like the smbclient and rpcclient binaries is used.
m_proc << "smbclient" << QString::fromLatin
m_proc << "rpcclient" << m_servered->text();
smbname(sysconfDir() + "/" + prt->printerName() + "/smbclient.conf");
kdelibs/kdeprint/lpr/matichandler.cpp: m_smbpath =
I cannot delete the Internet site, how does it work?
The point is that you must install on the provider to digit on a printer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20071114/6fd7154a/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint