[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#443230: Bug#443230: Bug#443230: Enable net usershare

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon at debian.org):

> Note that the correct group name was "admin", not "adm" which is a separate
> group; there doesn't seem to be an analogous group on Debian systems, so I
> haven't attempted to do any templating here.  Debian maintainers, please
> comment if you think we should be doing something better or if you think
> this Ubuntu-specific change shouldn't be included in the package for
> whatever reason.


Funnily, "admin" was discussed recently in debian-boot because it is
marked as reserved by D-I and a user was complaining about this (see
bug reports for user-setup).

Colin (Watson) explained why admin is reserved (for Ubuntu
purposes). I suggested we (D-I team) keep that name reserved to avoid
trivial "forks" for Ubuntu....and having us (samba) use it enforces
this, indeed.

So, in short, I'm OK to go with "admin".

Actually, this "admin" thing is maybe something where Ubuntu and
Debian could converge about, no?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20071114/b4de7061/attachment-0001.pgp