[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#443230: Bug#443230: Bug#443230: Bug#443230: Bug#443230: Enable net usershare

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon at debian.org):

> > Colin (Watson) explained why admin is reserved (for Ubuntu
> > purposes). I suggested we (D-I team) keep that name reserved to avoid
> > trivial "forks" for Ubuntu....and having us (samba) use it enforces
> > this, indeed.
> 
> > So, in short, I'm OK to go with "admin".
> 
> Are you saying that you're ok with it for Samba in Debian, or in Ubuntu?
> 
> I really don't think it's appropriate to use in Debian.  The admin group is
> historically not created by Debian's installer or base-files, so if it
> exists at all on older Debian systems it's because of action taken by the
> local administrator.  The resulting group may have completely different

Sorry, I may have misunderstood you.....and badly explain my point.

What I meant is that it is OK to *mention* this group in either
comments or commented settings.

Of course, as you point, Debian is not ready not have us use this
group by default.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20071115/0a06ff64/attachment.pgp