[Pkg-samba-maint] Swat broken by latest security update to Samba

Andrew Hougie andrew at hougie.co.uk
Tue Nov 27 09:54:36 UTC 2007


I'm sorry yes you're quite right my architecture is i386.

The security advisory DSA-1409-2 did list a swat package
(http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/s/samba/swat_3.0.24-6etch6_i386.deb)

but if this is in hand then that's all that matters.

Many thanks
Andrew

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:10:32AM +0000, Andrew Hougie wrote:
>> I get:
>
>> #aptitude install swat
>> ...
>> The following packages are BROKEN:
>>    swat
>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>    swat: Depends: samba-doc (= 3.0.24-6etch6) but 3.0.24-6etch7 is
>> installed.
>> Resolving dependencies...
>> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>
>> Install the following packages:
>> swat [3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>
>> Downgrade the following packages:
>> samba [3.0.24-6etch6 (stable, now) -> 3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>> samba-common [3.0.24-6etch6 (stable, now) -> 3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>> samba-doc [3.0.24-6etch7 (stable, now) -> 3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>> smbclient [3.0.24-6etch6 (stable, now) -> 3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>> smbfs [3.0.24-6etch6 (stable, now) -> 3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>> winbind [3.0.24-6etch6 (stable, now) -> 3.0.24-6etch4 (stable)]
>
> Then presumably the security update is not yet available for your
> architecture; but you didn't mention which architecture that is.  i386
> seems
> to be the only architecture missing from the archive, so I guess the
> binary
> wasn't built in time for the announcement to go out.  It should be
> available
> within the day.
>
> --
> Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
> slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
>




More information about the Pkg-samba-maint mailing list