<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.14">
<TITLE>RE: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#494899: samba print jobs remain visibleon XP clients</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Christian Perrier [<A HREF="mailto:bubulle@debian.org">mailto:bubulle@debian.org</A>]<BR>
Sent: Tue 8/12/2008 5:15 PM<BR>
To: James Zuelow; 494899@bugs.debian.org<BR>
Subject: Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#494899: samba print jobs remain visibleon XP clients<BR>
<BR>
forwarded 494899 <A HREF="https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5635">https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5635</A><BR>
thanks<BR>
<BR>
Quoting James F Zuelow Jr (james_zuelow@ci.juneau.ak.us):<BR>
> Package: samba<BR>
> Version: 2:3.2.0-4<BR>
> Severity: normal<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> The version of Samba currently in Lenny is subject to this upstream bug:<BR>
><BR>
> <A HREF="https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5635">https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5635</A><BR>
><BR>
> The systray applet showing print jobs remains active (surviving reboots)<BR>
> even after print jobs have completed.<BR>
><BR>
> Apparently fixed in 3.2.1<BR>
<BR>
Well, I really wonder if there is a big point in duplicating upstream<BR>
bugs in Debian's BTS.<BR>
<BR>
Waiting for my co-maintainers decision, I hereby "just" mark this bug<BR>
as forwarded upstream (and as it is apparently fixed upstream the bug<BR>
will end up marked "fixed-upstream").<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
--------------------<BR>
<BR>
I just wanted to bump it as one more reason to try to get 3.2.1 into Lenny. :)<BR>
<BR>
James</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>