[Pkg-scicomp-devel] anyone packaging Framewave?
Christophe Prud'homme
prudhomm at debian.org
Sun Apr 20 10:56:24 UTC 2008
here is what I got with the latest version of scons (0.98.1) and
framewave (17/04) when I run svn-buildpackage
it fails very early in the build
rm -f debian/cdbs-install-list debian/cdbs-package-list
cd Framewave && python2.5 /usr/bin/scons --clean
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/scons", line 161, in <module>
import SCons.Script
File "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Script/__init__.py", line 80, in <module>
import SCons.Options
ImportError: Bad magic number in /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/__init__.pyc
make: *** [clean] Error 1
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Albert Huang <albert at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Have you had a chance to look at this package yet?
>
> -albert
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
> <prudhomm at debian.org> wrote:
> > Albert
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Albert Huang
> > <ashuang at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > > Ok, this is fixed upstream now but not yet formally released. I've
> > > modified the package to build from framewave subversion, similar to
> > > how ffmpeg is packaged.
> > Ok
> > I am going to test it
> >
> >
> > >
> > > One question I'm not sure about is whether to keep framewave as two
> > > binary packages (libfwbase1, libfwbase1-dev) or eight -- two for each
> > > library (libfwbase1, libfwimage1, libfwvideo, etc). For now I've
> > > packaged them all together as libfwbase1, libfwbase1-dev because I
> > > don't think many people will have much use for them as separate
> > > packages.
> > I agree with you
> >
> > C.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-scicomp-devel mailing list
> Pkg-scicomp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-scicomp-devel
>
More information about the Pkg-scicomp-devel
mailing list