[Pkg-scicomp-devel] Comments regarding arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-1_amd64.changes

[Adam C Powell IV]

Hello again,

On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 07:09 +0900, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:25 +0000, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> > 
> > you really want to cut the stuff (Ricebsd and the mail asking
> > for clarification) from debian/. While you're at it, please drop
> > the empty README.Debian, too.
> > 
> > I am accepting the package, though, now, so arpack does not
> > need to go through NEW again.
> 
> Thanks.  I was going to, but wanted to minimize the changes vs. the old
> package.  I'll make some deeper changes to the package later.

I notice arpack is still frozen; should it be un-frozen now, or wait
until it's been ten days?

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-scicomp-devel/attachments/20081205/a2f16f04/attachment.pgp