[Pkg-scicomp-devel] paraview update
prudhomm at debian.org
Sat Feb 16 11:42:54 UTC 2008
On Feb 15, 2008 11:09 PM, Ondrej Certik <ondrej at certik.cz> wrote:
> praview from svn finally builds for me, when a fixed openmpi got into
> the archive today.
Ok we are on the same track then :)
> Here are lintian warnings I get:
> $ lintian /var/cache/pbuilder/result/paraview_3.2.1-1_amd64.changes
> W: paraview: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/paraview
> W: paraview: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/pqClient.adp
> W: paraview: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/pvdataserver
> W: paraview: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/pvrenderserver
> W: paraview: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/pvserver
> W: paraview: non-standard-dir-in-usr usr/plugins/
> W: paraview: file-in-unusual-dir
> W: paraview: package-contains-empty-directory usr/sbin/
> W: paraview: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/bin/pqClient.adp
> W: paraview: spelling-error-in-description succesfully successfully
> W: paraview: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> We need to write manpages and move the /usr/plugins somewhere else.
> The rest are minor bug, that should imho be quite easy to fix.\
what do you suggest regarding the plugins ?
Personnally I would suggest
which seems standard (qt,...)
Also to be consistent, should be remove the -3.2 "extension" or keep it
and now we would have also
I would prefer to get rid of the -3.2 entirely
what is your opinion ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pkg-scicomp-devel