<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Hi,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Just some quick notes:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>IMO you better start with the most recent version. It seems to not have the</div>
<div>previous DFSG-related issues (the whole orig-tarball target in debian/rules seems</div>
<div>to be obsolete!).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I took a quick look into the source and there is no need to run dh_autoreconf.</div>
<div>There is no configure.ac or Makefile.am file touched. One bug is about outdated</div>
<div>config.* files, which is usually solved by running the autotools-dev addon as we do</div>
<div>in almost all autotools related packages (gnome-chemistry-utils, etc.pp.). The abinit</div>
<div>5.x source already contains the necessary steps: it depends on autotools-dev and</div>
<div>debian/rules contains the snippets to copy them. It just copies them into the</div>
<div>wrong place. They must be copied into $(CURDIR)/config/gnu/.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Further if abinit 5.x does not have more buildd related issues atm, there is IMHO</div>
<div>no sense in rewriting the build system for this version. Better start with abinit 7 then.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>my 2 cents</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards, Daniel</div>
</div>
<div>
<div name="quote" style="border-left: #c3d9e5 2px solid; padding-bottom: 10px; margin: 10px 5px 5px 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 10px; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<div style="margin: 0px 0px 10px"><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 07. Januar 2014 um 09:56 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Andreas Tille" <andreas@an3as.eu><br/>
<b>An:</b> "Ondřej Čertík" <ondrej.certik@gmail.com><br/>
<b>Cc:</b> "DebiChem Project" <debichem-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>, 732520@bugs.debian.org<br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [Debichem-devel] Bug#732520: abinit: New upstream version, package unmaintained</div>
<div name="quoted-content">Hi,<br/>
<br/>
short status update: I have injected abinit to<br/>
<br/>
Vcs-Svn: svn://anonscm.debian.org/debichem/unstable/abinit/<br/>
<br/>
and did some generic packaging updates. Unfortunately I was running<br/>
into the problem that `autoreconf -f -i` fails. This issue seems to be<br/>
a bit tricky and I wonder whether it is worth fixing this one first or<br/>
whether it might sense to start with more recent versions of abinit.<br/>
<br/>
Ondřej, working in Vcs is perfectly independent from your NM progress -<br/>
in the contrary, you could proof your commitment here.<br/>
<br/>
Kind regards<br/>
<br/>
Andreas.<br/>
<br/>
[leaving full quote below since some time has passed in case you might<br/>
want to refresh your memory about this.]<br/>
<br/>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:29:42AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:<br/>
> Hi Ondřej,<br/>
><br/>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:46:47AM +0530, Ondřej Čertík wrote:<br/>
> > ><br/>
> > > What do you think about taking over abinit into DebiChem? I'd volunteer<br/>
> > > to help in the migration step if any help is needed.<br/>
> ><br/>
> > Thanks Andreas for the initiative.<br/>
> > I hope to get my NM process finished soon, so I should be able to help more.<br/>
><br/>
> I think any effort in abinit could be independent from your NM status. I'm<br/>
> running a sponsoring effort at<br/>
><br/>
> <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB" target="_blank">https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB</a><br/>
><br/>
> and abinit fits perfectly.<br/>
><br/>
> > Is pkg-scicomp dead?<br/>
><br/>
> Yes it is. It was basically merged into Debian Science. You can not<br/>
> register on alioth any more (you can not even see the alioth page of the<br/>
> project). Yesterday I was inspecting the SVN for some stuff which is<br/>
> worth keeping. Abinit was not in VCS anyway (which is bad).<br/>
><br/>
> > I haven't been following it lately. I would definitely<br/>
> > wait for Christophe (CCed) from pkg-scicomp to see what he thinks.<br/>
><br/>
> As far as I have understood Christophe in previous postings he is fine<br/>
> with the move from pkg-scicomp to other projects. The discussion about<br/>
> this on the related mailing list is about two years old.<br/>
><br/>
> > But as far as I am concerned, I'll be happy for abinit to be maintained<br/>
> > as part of any other group which is active.<br/>
><br/>
> It would be nice to have some statement of DebiChem team members whether<br/>
> to use SVN or Git (or whether they would prefer to not have it in<br/>
> DebiChem but rather Debian Science). Both would be fine for me.<br/>
><br/>
> Kind regards<br/>
><br/>
> Andreas.<br/>
><br/>
><br/>
> --<br/>
> <a href="http://fam-tille.de" target="_blank">http://fam-tille.de</a><br/>
><br/>
> _______________________________________________<br/>
> Debichem-devel mailing list<br/>
> Debichem-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org<br/>
> <a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debichem-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debichem-devel</a><br/>
<br/>
--<br/>
<a href="http://fam-tille.de" target="_blank">http://fam-tille.de</a><br/>
<br/>
_______________________________________________<br/>
Debichem-devel mailing list<br/>
Debichem-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org<br/>
<a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debichem-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debichem-devel</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>