sdlgfx 2.0.25

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

> Il Lunedì 13 Gennaio 2014 19:59, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > 2014/1/13 Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it>:
>>  Hi Manuel, I created a simple (building) sdl2gfx package.
>> 
>>  Can you please review/push on git or create a new git for pushing the 
> package?
> 
> I already created it a few weeks ago:
> 
>   http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-sdl/packages/libsdl2-gfx.git
> 

Now I understand why I didn't see it before... the previous one was sdlgfx.git, and the upstream project is SDL2_gfx so I was looking for something like sdl2gfx, without the "lib"...
Seems that with the "2" release every package has been moved to a name with the "lib" prepending, well
> 
> You can clone the repository, and then upload with "git-import-dsc"
> (if you have a .dsc file) or by hand.  Watch out the tags, and take
> "libsd2-mixer" or "libsdl2-image" as examples.

I will, anyway I think the work should be almost done

> 
> 
>>  I tried to keep it close to sdlgfx package, but I still don't know how 
> to properly give names to the new packages and some minor packaging.
> 
> Name (source) should be libsdl2-gfx in principle, to follow the
> pattern.  See "mixer" or "image" for examples on binary 
> package names.
> The names are defined in debian/control.
> 

Yes, I know debian/control :) I think the names are almost ok, however I think I'll add a "1.0" before the debian revision, to keep the package name coherent with the mixer one
> 
>>  Would be nice to have a review.
>> 
>>  I added the whole package and the debian directory alone, feel free to take 
> the one you prefer.
> 
> Will try to do it soon, but if I forget please ping me in a week or to.

No problem, please wait for my git push instead of reviewing the tarball :)
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers.
> -- 

Bests,

Gianfranco
> Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>
>